Wednesday, April 6, 2016

Lees die brief en besin voor jy DA stem



Met erkenning aan Front Nasionaal
Hierby aangeheg 'n brief wat ons ontvang het oor 'n oproep van 'n DA-werwer wat die persoon geskakel het en probeer werf het. Die brief gee die inhoud van die gesprek weer. Lekker brief om te lees.
As die DA stemme werf
Ek kry een oggend vroeg in Januarie ‘n oproep van ‘n werknemer van die DA wat kiesers opvorder om tog in die komende munisipale verkiesings vir die DA te stem.
Die oproep was van ‘n vrou wat Afrikaans praat. My afleiding was dat sy Blank is, te oordeel aan haar uitspraak.
My eerste vraag was: wat is die verskil in beleid en beginsel tussen die DA en die ANC? Waarom sal u sê moet ek vir die DA stem en nie vir die ANC nie? Daar was ‘n oe en ‘n aa maar geen antwoord nie. Ek sê toe: Dame, u kan vir my geen verskil aandui tussen die twee partye nie. Daarby het die DA het van sy blanke leier ontslae geraak ten gunste van ‘n swart leier. Die een na die ander Blanke in ‘n leiersposisie in die DA kry die trekpas. Wat doen die DA vir my as Blanke en veral vir my as Afrikaner in hierdie land?
“Die DA staan by die ‘konstitusie’ en ons doen wat die konstitusie voorskryf,” sê sy. “ons tree op volgens die wette van die land.” O, sê ek. En wie het dié grondwet, of konstitusie, soos u sê, geskryf? Sy swyf elf-talig. Ek praat weer. Dit is die ANC se grondwet. Dit is ‘n anti-Christelike grondwet. God-Drie-enig is uit die die grondwet weggelaat. “Maar dit gaan oor menseregte”, sê sy. “Alle mense het regte.
Ek weet, sê ek. Party mense het net meer regte as ander mense. As jy swart is, het jy volgens dié grondwet meer regte. Wat bied die DA vir my as Afrikaner? Weer is daar ‘n dawerende stilte.
Weet u waar kom die DA vandaan?, vra ek. Sy swyg. Ek vertel haar. Dit is die ou Prog-party van Helen Suzman en Harry Schwartz wat teen die NP van dr Verwoerd geveg het vir presies die beleid wat ons vandag het. Dit is die verlengstuk van die PFP van die 1970’s wat ‘n toestand van een mens een stem bepleit het presies soos ons dit vandag onder die ANC ervaar.
Ek vra weer: Is die die DA teen die verandering van die name van stede, dorpe en strate soos die ANC dit doen? Nog steeds ‘n stilte. Ek sê: dame, ek sien uit na die pamflet of plakkaat van die DA waarin die DA onderneem dat indien die DA die muinisipale verkiesings in Pretoria wen, dan sal al die name van die strate weer terug verander word na die geskiedkundige name soos ons dit geken het voor die bloedlose oorgawe van die NP aan die ANC onder druk van die DA.
“Meneer, geniet u dag”. Ek sê: ‘n mooi dag vir u ook. Moenie staatmaak op my stem vir die DA nie. Ek is ‘n Blanke. Ek is ‘n Afrikaner.
Louis van der Schyff
Pretoria

Friday, April 1, 2016

As Steve Praat . . .



Ope Brief Van Steve Hofmeyr - Jy Steel Nie Omdat Jy Honger Of Arm Is Nie - Jy Steel Omdat Jy 'n Skelm Is. ‘n Mens moor nie omdat jy voorheen benadeel is of omdat jou werkgewer jou nie tederlik genoeg behandel nie – ‘n mens moor omdat jy ‘n barbaar is wat nie verdien om deel van die samelewing te wees nie. ‘n Mens word nie ‘n agtergeblewene omdat iemand anders nie genoeg vir jou doen nie. ‘n Mens word ‘n agterblyer omdat jy nie presteer nie.
Laat ons dus maar vandag oor ‘n paar sake reguit praat:
‘n Mens steel nie omdat jy honger of arm is nie – jy steel omdat jy skelm is. Niemand was nog ooit in hierdie land so volledig onderdruk soos die Boerevolk na die Tweede Vryheidsoorlog nie.
Ons voorouers wat die oorlog en die konsentrasiekampe oorleef het, het na die doodse leegheid van vernietigde plase teruggekeer – uitgehonger, hartseer en verpletter.Maar hulle het nie geroof en gemoor en gesteel nie.
Hulle het met harde werk, deursettingsvermoë en swaarkry so presteer dat hulle weldra nie net hulleself nie, maar ook hulle huidige onderdukkers, goed kon versorg.
Toe hulle kinders in Engelse skole gestop is en gestraf is as hulle dit durf waag het om Afrikaans te praat, het hulle nie klippe gegooi en skole afgebrand en geweld gepleeg nie.
Hulle het hard geleer, hulle eie CNO-skole gestig en uiteindelik bo uitgekom sodat die Boerevolk vandag vir niemand op akademiese, tegnologiese of wetenskaplike gebied terug hoef te staan nie.
‘n Mens moor nie omdat jy voorheen benadeel is of omdat jou werkgewer jou nie tederlik genoeg behandel nie – ‘n mens moor omdat jy ‘n barbaar is wat nie verdien om deel van die samelewing te wees nie.
Na die Tweede Vryheidsoorlog het Boere-mynwerkers absoluut geen regte gehad het nie en moes hulle gesinne met minder as ‘n hongerloon probeer onderhou. Maar hulle het nie bejaardes gaan doodmartel en gesinne uitgemoor nie.
‘n Mens word nie ‘n agtergeblewene omdat iemand anders nie genoeg vir jou doen nie. ‘n Mens word ‘n agterblyer omdat jy nie presteer nie.
Niemand het die Boerevolk na die Tweede Vryheidsoorlog vooruit gehelp nie – ons het self gewerk en volhard om sukses te behaal.
En elke ding wat ons het, het ons verwerf – apartheid het nooit plase en poste en posisies aan Boeremense uitgedeel nie.
As alles altyd vir jou verkeerd loop sodat jy voel jy maak nooit enige vordering nie, is dit dalk ‘n goeie gedagte om op te hou soek wie anders as jy self vir al jou ellende verantwoordelik is. Ruk jou reg en presteer jouself in die voorspoed in.
En dit geld vir ons eie mense ook. Net ons eie werk, prestasie en geloof gaan bepaal of ons as agterblyers in die vergetelheid gaan wegsink en of ons weer as trotse, beskaafde, gerespekteerde volk sal opstaan.
Selfs in die nuwe Suid-Afrika is daar steeds geleenthede vir vindingryke, geesdriftige mense wat bereid is om hard te werk en vir hulleself ‘n toekoms los te spook.
Mag die Boerevolk nooit pateties raak nie.

Do we still have a democracy in South Africa?



Can we, after the ruling yesterday by the CC re The Hon. Zuma and the Inkhandla-gate, say that we have a democracy in South Africa?
Probably not at grassroots level, but officially our democracy is alive and well and living in the court rooms and the office of the PP.
Because there is so little honesty in politics today, what you hear (promises) is more often than not, NOT what you GET.
The PAC promised free houses for all and would probably confiscate it from the "haves" of those days - only to give it to the elect few of their inner circle.
The ANC promised freedom for all - an expensive and all encompassing commodity. After 22 years of "true" democracy, this commodity is even scarcer that ever.
80% of the school system is dysfunctional. It is being controlled by trade unions whose only aim is control in the widest sense of the word. Despite their denial, there is probably a great element of the in the report that laid the scandal of the selling of teacher posts (vacancies) bare.
The only "salvation" are the prior Category-C schools, which, although mostly English (Black) today, are striving to keep up some form of standard. "Disciple" is, unfortunately, a foreign word.
Wake up, Zuma-dom, and realize that this country is going to shreds!
Everything has its price today, except quality - That is price less, so priceless that it appears to be unobtainable!
Viva South Africa, Viva! Viva Democracy, Viva!
South Africa, the World (and Standard & Poor) will be watching the developments in the next few days with interest.
My best wishes
(1) to Mr. Pravin Gordham and the Treasury who must produce the Inkhandla figures for Mr. Zuma,
(2) also to Mr. Zuma who must now fire his ministers (Police, Public Works) who did his dirty work, thinking that there will be some form of (p)raise for them in the process - more gravy, perhaps? and
(3) to the Executive of the ANC, who must fire the Hon. Mr. Zuma.
Acknowledgement: Wesley Lamprecht

Wednesday, March 30, 2016

Swart Rassisme vs Wit Rassisme



RASSISME-WETGEWING
Hannes Engelbrecht (Front Nasionaal).
Zuma en sy trawante, die grootste rassiste van omgekeerde Apartheid, beplan blykbaar wetgewing om rassisme ‘n misdaad te maak. By Front Nasionaal het ons sedert die twyfelagtige “Penny Sparrow”-saak boekgehou – vir elke een wit rassistiese uitspraak wat opgeblaas word in die media was daar meer as 70 swart rassistiese uitsprake.
Die feit van die saak is dat daar wel wit rassisme is. Dit is, volgens ons by Front Nasionaal, egter slegs een van die simptome van die veel erger siekte. Dit is ook ietwat laf om 10% van die bevolking se rassisme uit te lig en die ander 90% se rassisme te ignoreer.
Stereotipering en veralgemening is deel van die mensdom en dit sal altyd deel van die mensdom bly. Dit is deel van stereotipering om ‘n rassegroep almal oor dieselfde kam te skeer – veral as die veralgemening van toepassing gemaak kan word op ‘n meerderheid van daardie rassegroep. En veral ook as dit statisties gestaaf kan word deur misdaadsyfers, plaasaanvalle, die tronkbevolking en onderwysuitslae.
Kan jy ‘n gewone witmens kwalik neem as hy ‘n grootliks swart sirkus in sy hoogste gesag, die Parlement, sien en veralgemeen dat dit die swart psige is? Nie almal is filosowe of politici nie – die gewone mens kyk met sy oe en hoor met sy ore.
Daagliks sien ekself en duisende wittes hoe basiese dienste in hospitale en plaaslike owerhede onder swart beheer ineenstort.
Wat is die witte se gevoel as hy sien dat die kwotastelsel in sport toegepas word sodat die swak skakel in sportspanne die kwotaspeler is? Wat is die witte se gevoel as hy sien hoe swart kaderontplooiing in regstellende aksie klaaglik misluk in Eskom, die SAA, Transnet en die Poskantoor? Daardie simptoom word die siekte, want die stereotipering word daardeur versterk.
Jare gelede was daar ‘n kinderreeks oor Tyl Uilspieel, ‘n dwaas wat allerhande stommiteite aangevang het. Op ‘n vraag aan Uilspieel waarom almal vir hom kwaad is, antwoord hy: “Want ek maak daarna”.
Vandag ry Tyl Uilspieel met ‘n donkerbril in ‘n swart BMW met getinte ruite en flitsende blou ligte. Sy arrogante houding in staatskantore, supermarkte, werksplekke en vakbonde vervreem die witte. Hy neem geen verantwoordelikheid vir sy eie dade nie.
Stereotipering en veralgemening oor ‘n rassegroep is ‘n simptoom van die groter siekte van arrogansie, onbekwaamheid en kultuurvreemde gebruike. As ek lees van sangomas, tradisionele slagtings, veelwywery, korrupsie en magsmisbruik is dit vanselfsprekend dat ‘n rassevlam sal begin brand.
Natuurlik is daar wit rassisme, want nes Tyl Uilspieel maak die ANC daarna.

Sunday, March 27, 2016

Jacob the Liar and Thief



Invoices now show Jacob Zuma personally benefitted from palace upgrades. On Sunday the Sunday Times confirmed what South Africans have long believed, that Jacob Zuma lied, and personally benefitted from the upgrades which took place at his R247 million private Nkandla residence.
This contradicts what Zuma previously articulated in Parliament where he stated that he and his family had not benefitted materially from the upgrades.
Zuma previously told Parliament that “My residence in Nkandla was paid for by the Zuma family. All the buildings and every room we use in that residence was built by ourselves as a family and not by government. I have never asked government to build a home for me, and it has not done so.”
He also said that “What the security has done for security features does not include the houses you have counted. They are neither in my residence nor my home.”
The information release by the Sunday Times today, which was not made available to the Public Protector during her investigation into Nkandla, shows that taxpayers money was spent on Zuma’s private residences in Nkandla including items such as air conditioning, aluminum windows, paved walkways and even six door mats which each cost R1500.

It was confirmed today that whites are not racists when they shop where blacks work



Not so long ago Mmusi Maimane made the the racist remark that he despises it that whites go to the big shops where blacks must work and serve these whites.
I was one of the whites that called for the blood of this racist Maimane but nothing happened. Even the SAHRC said no it was not racist because we whites are ignorant of the fact that blacks are never racists.
But now I have to confess, today I went to one of those big Hyper Shops and what did I see? Just blacks where you look in the shop serving whites. I immediately felt ashamed and apologised to one black cashier for them to work without pay serving all these white racists.
"What?", she said. "Working here without pay? Are you smoked my white racist".
I told her what Maimane said and that he is dreaming of the day that they the blacks will no longer have to work for whites.
Then she laughed again and said that then it is Maimane who was smoked because a job is a job and the pay and benefits are good.
I asked whether she think that whites are racists when blacks are working in the shops and she said no, look at the queues with all the rich blacks waiting to pay. Did I think they were racists too? Anyway, these blacks have more money than us whites!
And then she said that rather the owners of these mega shops are the racists because did I see any white working there?
Tonight I am glad I am not a white racist!

Friday, March 25, 2016

Letter to Cyril Ramaphosa



Dear Mr Ramaphosa,
Your public announcement’s this week mark a decisive turn from your usual role as the mute DP. Perhaps having given the Marikana massacre enough ‘silent time’ has made you want to come out into the light.
Alternatively, could this be waning support for Shower Head within the caucus or are you trying to put up a more palatable front for the people* especially in light of a Provincial Government election around the corner?
I think it is a little bit of the latter.
I think the ANC has got you to do two very clever things;
this kind of spin must have come from deep within the recesses of Luthuli House ‘s desperation for it to be so utterly bold and arrogant.
Here is an attempted reconstruction of what must have been your brief if we  draw from your current public utterances:
First, Comrade you will tell the voters how the ANC is cracking down on any attempts at state capture by any nefarious third party. Oh and don’t forget to tell the events planner that Indian food will no longer be an option at state luncheons.
You will say how this is an outrage, how despicable it is that we could have got to this point. But you will make no mention of how the internal ANC structures sat on this mess for years. That would kind of defeat the point.
We must try and distance the ANC image from the Guptas even though they currently are in bed with us. Also, side note, please ask Busi to change the sheets.
Secondly, you must reassure the voters that we are gunning for any white-owned enterprises, please Baba, make sure you point out that the whites have enjoyed too much control over the economy for too long, even though
Gedley’hlekisa Zuma destroyed the economy in one day, and that we have done fokol for the voters since he came into power.
Please also do not mention our failure with basic education among others, and how in spite of our shoddy work the black middle class has grown exponentially. We must make them still feel like victims, Comrade.
Mr Ramaphosa please do not insult the intelligence of the people your government has continued to try and keep in the dark.
Your Zuma might throw his caucus under the bus, but you cannot throw us the people of South Africa under the bus. We won’t be divided to make up for your utter failure to run a country (as the meme says, “You had one job!”).
You will not pit people against each other, you will not shield Zuma. We the people are coming for you, the ANC.
IZWE LETHU
* One should say voters; ANC doesn’t give two fucks about the people, just look at their service delivery track record. No, they see people as numbers, nothing more.

Thursday, March 24, 2016

South Africa's Unofficial Civil War



Very few African countries escaped the horror of civil war in the post-Colonialist era. In most cases the civil war resulted from a power struggle between corrupt quasi-politicians with more interest in their own pockets, than in that of the country. As a result, the country itself often bled to death. Rwanda, Mozambique, Angola, Uganda, Rhodesia and numerous others were examples of this phenomenon.
FW de Klerk and Nelson Mandela told us in 1994: South-Africa would be different. We learned from the mistakes of our neighbours. We will have a peaceful transition into a full “democracy”. And the world (including the majority of South Africans) desperately wanted to believe this.
There would be no democracy. After 22 years we have a political system with a grandiose constitution on the books, and only the rotten remains of the promises that were made, underneath. The “democracy” has turned into a “cleptocracy”…
…and a silent, deadly, destructive civil war against minorities, based on racist motives. In short, the white population of South Africa is fast becoming the vanquished in an effective guerrilla war which has not even once been condemned by the government. In fact, the ANC government, along with the opposition DA, entertains the notion of the rest of the world: “Let us ignore this and pretend that the multiculturalist experiment in South Africa is successful. Why, the very annihilation of an entire nation, the brutal torture of the elderly, the rape and murder of little children is not an unreasonable price to pay for our fantasy.”
Well, let us at least then have the common decency to admit and recognise the fact that South Africa is a country of blood and pain and turmoil. Of which March 2016 will go down in history as one of the bloodiest ever. We mourn the loss, the pain and the suffering of these victims and we assure their family and relatives of our heartfelt condolences and sympathy in their hour of bereavement. That is the least we can offer.
PLEASE SHARE THIS POST
Daniel Lötter
Front Nasionaal Suid-Afrika
DEPT INFORMATION

Wednesday, March 23, 2016

The Anti-Racism Circus




1. An Overdue Initiative
When I received an invitation to attend the Department of Justice and Constitutional Development Consultation on a National Action Plan to Combat Racism, Discrimination, Xenophobia and Intolerance, I was encouraged. It sounded like a great idea. About time that somebody in government was going to do something constructive about all the farm murders and irresponsible politicians singing: “Kill the Boer! Kill the farmer!” and “one settler – one bullet!” rebel rousers wearing: “kill all whites” T-shirts on campus. With all the talk about “Eradicating Afrikaans”, destroying art treasures and national monuments, this initiative was obviously long overdue.
2. Through the Looking Glass
However, it was not long after arriving at the Conference Centre in Century City that I had this uncomfortable feeling, like Alice in Wonderland, that I had fallen through The Looking Glass and was at some kind of Mad Hatters Tea Party! It was not just the opulent catering overflowing the tables. The speakers seemed to have misread the Memo. Unless my ears were deceiving me, speaker after speaker seemed to be promoting racism, discrimination, xenophobia and intolerance!
3. Defining the Terms
I turned to the Draft document for Public Consultation of the National Action Plan and read the definitions at the beginning of this glossy DOG publication. Yes, there it was: “Hate crimes: acts motivated by bias based on the identity (with reference to race, religion, national origin…) of a victim are forms of bias motivated violence… hate crimes are message crimes that send a message of fear to an entire community… hate crimes, particularly when they do not meet an adequate response from the state, violate fundamental principles of equality and non-discrimination can lead to social unrest.”
“Discrimination: imposes burdens, obligations or disadvantages on, or withholds benefits from, opportunities or advantages from any person, on one or more of the prohibited grounds.”
“Institutionalised Racism: any kind of system of inequality based on race…”
4. Blatant Racism in the Name of Combatting Racism
Yet, I was hearing speakers clearly advocated, what to me seemed to be racist hate speech, institutionalised intolerance and systematic discrimination against whites in general and Afrikaners in particular.
5. Inexplicable Omissions and Outrageous Generalisations
Not only were they not dealing with the thousands of farmers murdered in South Africa, but they were making the most outrageous generalisations and racist statements, such as:
“All whites are racist!”
“We have to invade those sectors where whites are still in charge!”
“All whites must be re-educated!”
“The honeymoon period of democracy has come to an end!”
“Equality is not enough! This is not a single issue revolution!”
“No more reconciliation!”
“The white culture must fall!”
“Racial superiority is expressed through sports!”
“Rugby is everything to the Afrikaners. You want to hurt the Afrikaner, you must crush their rugby. We must insist that at least 50% of all their rugby teams are black.”
“Afrikaans is not a language for education. It has no place in universities.”
“We need to deconstruct the systematic racism by eradicating whiteness.”
“We have had 21 years of carrots – now we need the sticks! They must feel the pressure to compel them to hand over all their resources!”
“The biggest failure of the TRC was it failed to address sports!”
“We cannot allow the constitution to get in the way of redistributing all wealth and removing whites from all positons of authority and land ownership.”
“God is the Ultimate Racist!”
Nikhiel Deepalal, National Chairperson for Students for Law and Social Justice decaled that he used to believe in God until he saw all the inequality and realised that God is the ultimate racist! Therefore he had given up on religion, because of inequality.
“Christianity is Racist!”
One previous speaker, Congress of South Africans Trade Unions (CASATU), Tony Ehrenreich, declared that “racism is inculcated in every doctrine of Christianity!”
Atheist Agenda
The absolutely mindless, out-of-touch with reality, Marxist, atheist hatred for Christianity from some of the speakers was staggering.
6. Double Standards
I looked back at the definitions at the beginning of this document and sure enough, bias against any religion or conscience constituted hate speech. Yet here were a steady stream of speakers stereotyping all whites and Christians and males in the most hostile and prejudicial language! There was evidently a blatant double standards and blindness to their own hatred and racism.
The fact is that only Biblical Christianity offers a rational basis for opposing racism and for pursuing justice. Equality before the law is a Biblical principle (Numbers 15:15). It is a fact of history that the teachings and example of Jesus Christ inspired the invention of hospitals, the nursing profession, history’s greatest charitable movements, the abolition of the slave trade and much more. The teachings of Jesus Christ to love your neighbour, to do unto others as you want them to do unto you, the good Samaritan, and so much more, has inspired the greatest acts of charity, compassion and mercy ever seen in history.
One speaker, Nikhiel Deepalal ranted on about why are whites allowed to be on university faculties. Why were students of law required to study British, Roman and Dutch law. Why not just study traditional Juris prudence?  Why do we require professors and judges to have years of experience? “What is wrong with making professors of 25 year olds?” he asked, but did not give an opportunity for anyone to answer. One wondered what traditional juris prudence he was referring to, as Shaka and Dingaan were not particularly known for the rule of law or democracy. Tens-of-thousands were bludgeoned or impaled on the mere word of the king and 156 tribes exterminated in the genocidal Mfecane, which killed over 3 million people in the early 1800s. What traditional juris prudence is this man talking about and who would actually and who would actually want to live under such an arbitary rule of dictators and witchdoctors?
Gillian Schutte, the Co-Founder of Media for Justice, ranted and raved against whiteness and all whites being racist and the need for all whites to be re-educated. She also railed against patriarchy and made clear that it was not just white males that they were against, but black patriarchy is also the enemy. Several spoke about the need for the second phase of “the Revolution”.
Evidently many of the speakers at this consultation saw themselves as victims and even after 21 years of ANC rule were not willing to take responsibility for anything wrong in the country. Anything wrong is the fault of whites and apartheid. The solution is Socialism, Communist Revolution, confiscation, and radical feminist, GayGB Pink Inquisition deconstructing systemic racism, eradicating whiteness and advancing traditional juris prudence! Inevitably from all this will flow socialist utopia and we will then all live happily ever after.
By Peter Hammond
7 March 2016







Tuesday, March 22, 2016

Zuma and His Racards! Boring Stuff!



Zuma continuous to use the race cards and blaming whites. This is the the only ammunition at their disposal. ENOUGH of this! This should stop.
Currently it is all about me and my racist corner and me and my cronies. We as a nation have lost the plot. We lie, we cheat, we steal, we rape, we torture, we abuse, we murder, etc. with no end in sight. Not to mention the utter failing of our legal and economic platforms. Crime is out of control because there are no harsh enough penalties as deterrents. Notwithstanding failure in the apprehending of criminals and the successful prosecution thereof.
This Colonized Apartheid Rhetorics (CARS) combined with capitalist communist mafia cronies must stop.
What do we mean by Colonized Apartheid Rhetoric’s (CARS)?
It is like somebody talking about so-called evils of a car that they never had, experienced, driven of even have seen. Yet they claim to be the know it all master of none like the EFF. Even the EFF claim that his people had it better under Apartheid.
This nonsense of CARS must be stopped at all cost as to prevent the total destruction of our democracy. Colonized Apartheid Rhetoric which was burdened on a nation by an corrupt English Anglo Empire which was and are currently used by external forces to manipulate this country.
Currently the constitution is undermined and under threat by capitalist communist mafia cronies like i.e. Zuma and the Guptas and many more factors such as Colonized Apartheid Rhetoric’s. This country currently are ruled by the Guptas which is tantamount to a state grab or que de ta. This is not the 1st time. Who can forget the corrupt relationship between Zuma and Shabier Shake? Also take into account that even political entities such as the SA Communist who leaches on to ANC and whom have never stood alone in election. They know that they would never stand a chance to win an election on their own. Yet they occupy every important department of the corrupt government. Their doctrines are mirrored through policies adopted and steamrolled through parliament with no affect or succeeded resistance from opposition due to their strength in numbers. We saw this twice when there was failed attempt to get rid of Zuma with a vote of no confidence.
The ANC is playing very fatal dangerous game. If Zuma is not recalled then it opens the door to a dangerous Pandora box which could pave the way for civil unrest like you have not seen in your life time in this country. Even maybe out right civil war. Our constitution is losing its value and even authority day by day because these matters are conveniently ignored on purpose.
Franscois Malan

Monday, March 21, 2016

Zuma and his Race Frenzy




Let's have a parody on race. Not the race of life, but the issue of race, you know: I'm a black man in terms of racial classification.
It raises many questions when you think about it.
When I look at myself in the mirror, I wonder why I'm called 'black'. I'm not really black. I'm more brown, of sorts, albeit a deep dark brown. But I cannot call myself brown, or even dark brown, as there are people who are known as brown people, i.e. the Coloured people. Now if they are known as brown or Coloured, why am I known as black?
It's rather confusing. I also have a colour, which means I'm also coloured, strictly spoken, although my colour is a bit darker than their colour, although I'm also brown, rather than black.
To make it more confusing I can assure you, is that you actually get Coloured or brown people who are darker brown than I am, yet they are not black, but coloured.
You see? Where are we going with this?
The brown or Coloured people speak mainly Afrikaans, not Zulu, like me. Afrikaans is the Boer language, spoken by most whites in SA.
In America you have black Americans. Mr Obama ia a black American. But he is actually of mixed race, like our Colured people, as his mother was white. His father was black like we in Africa. Now he is called an 'African American', as if he is like us black Africans. But he is not. He is racially like our Coloured (brown) people. He also does not speak a black African language, just as is the case with our Coloured people. Now why should he be a black American if he is actually a Coloured? Eish.
Mr Zuma our President (aptly called Zoombie by my best friend Sommie Somerset Morkel), is of lighter brown colour, but he is black because he is a Zulu like I am. But he is lighter brown than many of the Coloured people in SA. Yet he is black.
It becomes more confusing when it gets to the white people. They are not really white. They have a peculiar colour which is really hard to describe, but it's not white, as white is the colour of snow, which they are by far not. They are something between pink, orange, red or such, also in different hues. In the black community we have albinos, who are whiter than any whites, i assure you. Yet they are black. Confusing? For sure.
Take the Chinese. Are they yellow? And those in India. What colour are they really? Why are they not called according to colour? Why is it that only when it gets to black that people who are actually brown are called black? But in SA people who are mixed race are called brown, contrary to America where they are called black?
In America they have something like Black History Month. But to me black has a negative connotation such as in bad. A black month to me would seem to link with a dark time, which is not good, as it sounds like a time of disaster, a negative period of time. Well, maybe it is, as black history in both America and SA reflect more darkness than light.
People of colour are called dark skinned, and white people are called light skinned. But dark is negative (pun intended), while light is positive. Eish.
It's actually a bit ridicilous, the way man has structured his view of race. Where are we going with this?
Some people nowadays get very upset on the issue of race. The famous world champion rugby team of New Zealand whom I greatly respect, are called the All Blacks. But the team is mostly populated by whites. The blacks in the team are more brown than black. That is not right, I would consider. When will someone protest that?
In SA it is the stated policy of the ANC government to eradicate racism. We know they lie when we look at the facts, for how can they do that if they promote blackness but ignore brownness and Indianness and discriminate against whiteness? Is this a matter of darkness trying to overcome light? It sure seems like it.

Die ANC, DA en EFF se Gekerm en Gekla oor Rassisme!!!!



Daagliks brand "die volk" skole, universiteite, klinieke, winkels en dies meer af, bestuur paaie, damme, die Landbou en enige kommoditeit denkbaar in hulle peetjie, vermoor hulle blanke boere, huts hulle die massa aan om te roof, kaap, verkrag, martel en vir dood agter te laat.
Maar vandag marsjeer "die volk" teen die euwel der euwels: rassisme. Om sodoende stemme te werf vir die komende verkiesings, die ANC kaders in hulle poste te hou en om die aandag op die "rassistiese", wetsgehoorsame, belastingbetalende blankes te vestig. Sodoende verskuif die fokus weg van die ANC/EFF se georkestreerde agenda van vernietiging, verdien hulle punte op hulle eindelose pad na "freedom".

Friday, March 18, 2016

Die Suid-Afrikaanse Sirkus van die ANC



Liewe Ouma
Gupta'n'all is mos ons nuwe mafia. Of impi. Meneer Zuma giggel net daaroor. Die Guptas werk mos al van 2000 af toe die Onderwysdepartement duisende Sahara-rekenaars gekoop het vir GOL. Daai was nou lekker geld maak.
Nou het Vytjie Mentor haar agterent gewip vir die Zuptas. Met Vytjie gaan hulle tweede kom. Jy kan mos aan haar naam hoor sy het leer skel op die Parade. Mens kan maar se dat Vytjie 'n appeltjie te skil het met die koolkoppe.
Vandag sluit die skole. Nou kan die universiteitstudente gaan rus en vakansie hou na 'n uitputtende kwartaal van tyres brand. Puntestate is nie so belangrik nie. Oom Awie reken hulle gaan maar net toyi-toyi vir punte teen Oktober. So word ons 'n uitmuntende nasie.
Standard & Poor wil Suid Afrika nou rommelstatus gee. Was hulle al in die townships? Ons het lankal rommelstatus. Soos in vuilgoed - veral in die regering.
Ouma sal nie glo nie. Vyf ouens bedank, dan dink hulle die land kom tot stilstand. Dis soos die Enslins wat destyds met twee waens weggebreek het van Gerrit Maritz se trek af. Hulle was so deurmekaar dat hulle gedink het die drie groot koppe by Sandrivierspoortnek is piramides. Toe noem hulle die dorp Nylstroom, want hulle dog dis Egipte.
Nou sien ons dis eintlik Indie. Nou word Nylstroom Guptaville. En ons kry Mandaryns ook in die skole, dan toyi-toyi ons op maat van die Kama Sutra vir punte.
Groete
Hansie.
NS. Is die vye al ryp? Vytjie se perdeprukke is nie vye nie.
Met erkenning: FRONT NASIONAAL



Thursday, March 17, 2016

What South Africans Think Of Zuma




It is saddening when to watch ANC members in parliament selling their souls protecting the very same man who has destroyed this country. Jacob Zuma was never fit for presidency from the day he came from his mother's womb he is an earthquake what do earthquakes do?? Look around you he has divided the country racially and economically, socially, pschologically, morally he is a curse in this country everything he touches turns into a Tsunami
Tantaswa Ntswam
#SatANcMustFall

The Apartheid System Of The Whites Replaced By The Apartheid System Of The ANC



WHEN APARTHATE REPLACED APARTHEID
For a number of decades now the ANC dressed themselves as a “liberation movement” opposed to the policy of apartheid.
They opposed the relocation of people by force in District Six and elsewhere, yet they develop the property reform act which means that farmers will be forced to relocate from their property and they remove the impoverished white families to Munsieville to live on an old rubbish dump.
They opposed the fact that only some South Africans were allowed to vote in elections under apartheid rule, yet they propose to remove voter’s from the roll whose addresses cannot be confirmed. Question is: would “Hut number 4 behind the rubbish heap when you turn left at the chicken coop behind the 63rd spaza shop in the gravel road that runs from the back of the taxi rank when you climb over the wall” count as a legal address or will 22 De la Rey Ave be the one to be removed?
They opposed apartheid legislation listing people as unwanted opponents of the state, yet they propose a law to list people at random as being “racists” and punishing them.
They opposed the “racism” of apartheid, yet they create 119 racially based laws including Affirmative Action and BEE to impoverish the country to the brink of junk status.
They opposed the substandard Bantu Education of apartheid, yet their own youth are burning down universities and centres of education and manage to create the poorest education system in the world.
They opposed the fact that apartheid did nothing towards nation building, yet they allow the massacre of the minority of the nation.
They complained of apartheid using government funds for defence and other purposes and for not building anything, yet they use government funds for Nkandla and destroy what has been built already.
What has changed? Nothing. We are living the mirror image of apartheid, only now it is more bloody and more racist and more destructive than what they claimed the first to be.
Which makes one ponder the statement made by a well-known Afrikaner activist last year: “Black people created apartheid. Go figure.”
Daniel Lötter
FNSA Information.
2 hours ago · Public · in Timeline Photos

Tuesday, March 15, 2016

Gatvol!!!



Soos ek gesê het, gaan ek 'n gedig plaas, wat waarskynlik 'n hele paar mense sal onstel en wie dan asseblief maar skuiling elders sal moet gaan soek.
Ek is net mooi GATVOL vir al die sinnelose en onregverdige aanvalle teen my en my mense. GATVOL vir uitsprake soos "Die moeilikheid het begin toe Jan van Riebeeck in die Kaap aangekom het.", dat die ""apartheid" die oorsaak is dat skole afgebrand word, hospitale verval, Eskom in sy moer is, elke munisipaliteit a.g.daarvan bankrot is (terwyl ALLE munisipalitiete destyds 'n baie gesonde batige saldo in die bank gehad het! En uiters funksioneel was)
en die staatsdiens so korrup en vol bedrog is,...ge-erf van die apartheids regime!!!!!!
Ek is GATVOL geluister na die grond wat ons van hulle gesteel het, GATVOL vir die aantuigings dat die witman die onderdrukker is, die gevolg dat die al die ander rasse ägtergeblewenes" is. GATVOL om te hoor dat ons, die witman, net agteroor gesit het terwyl "hulle" die land opgebou het, paaie en geboue gebou het en die land in welvaart omskep het!!!
Die geskiedenis bewys dat "hulle" reeds baie agtergeblewene" hier aangetref was, met die aankoms van ons voorvaders uit lande waar daar reeds merkwaardige argitektoniese pronkstukke gebou was,...vooruitgang, universiteite en selfs al 'n tremdiens!!
Bykans 8 jaar gelede het ek die volgende geskryf:
IS DIT MY SKULD MENEER DIE PRESIDENT?
Is dit my skuld meneer die president,
dat my voorvaders 350 jaar gelede
u volk van hul alfabet en biblioteke kom onteien het?
U kerke, u skole en u universiteite geinfiltreer en tot niet gemaak het?
U paaie, u mynboubedrywe en u banke verwoes het?
U hawens gebombardeer het en
u skepe gekelder het?
U hospitale en farmatologiese instansies besoedel het...
en u bybel verbrand het?
Is dit my skuld dat ek die kleur van my Vader dra
en dat Sy gees in my as Adamiese wese geblaas is?
Dra ek die skuld van u swart huid
en u onsterflike haat
teen my blank gelaat?
Is dit my skuld dat u en my kulturele agtergronde nie versoenbaar is nie?
En dat my blondkop blouoog meisiekind nie met u seun wil trou nie?
Dalk was u navorsinginstitute ver bo my voorvaders gevorder.
U intellektuele instansies ver bo my Westerdenke
en u geloof in u voorvadergeeste en gode sterker dan my geloof
en u wielontwerp ronder dan myne.
Ek gee u toe,...
my voorvaders het u verwesters
en u sal nooit weer op u eie,
uself weer kan vind!
Dit meneer die President,
....is my skuld!
Pine Pienaar.
Ek groet graag die wat "pad vat"!
Met dankbaarheid, die uwe.

Thursday, March 10, 2016

The Freedom for which the ANC fought for 90 odd years?



Any scientists out there?
In South Africa, when a train or bus service arrives late, it is not uncommon for a mob to burn it. When [free] housing is demanded, houses are torched. When [free] sanitation is demanded, public toilets are demolished. When [free] education is demanded, schools and universities are destroyed. When better [free] medical facilities are demanded, clinics are burned. When 'respect for African culture' is demanded, cultural treasures belonging to other cultures are destroyed. Is this sort of behaviour taught, or is it genetic? Scientists, please enlighten us; we are mystified.

Monday, March 7, 2016

Rhoda Kadalie Having her Say about White Privelege


Their commitment makes nonsense of this notion of ‘white privilege’ and ‘whiteness’ in our racist discourse today.
Let me put my cards on the table. I hate the rhetoric from protesting students about “black pain”, “white privilege” and “whiteness”.
They are hellbent on stirring up violence, division and disruption to their education just because they have to work. Yes, they need to work like all of us black students had to under apartheid.
There was no national student fund for us, accommodation was scarce and we did menial tasks to get through higher education. It is time the protesters admit their rage is about the battle for the hearts and minds of the student vote since the Democratic Alliance Student Organisation is unexpectedly taking over student representative councils, not least because of the dishevelment of many of them.
Of course, students struggle and there are accommodation issues. And yes, universities are alienating. But that is part of becoming an adult.
Our protesting students avoid adulthood and are poor role models for kids at school, who are keen to succeed.
What do they see? Students burning art, smashing pianos and burning down libraries and labs. This week, I spent an entire day evaluating a rural music and arts project with my team in the farmlands of Grabouw.
I discovered four white women who, in my estimation, should receive an international award for doing national development work government should be doing. Their commitment makes nonsense of this notion of “white privilege” and “whiteness” in our racist discourse today.
These Mother Teresas share with a dedication unmatched their music and arts expertise with local children. The first stop was Pineview Primary.
In a small prefab classroom, about 60 kids sang in a choir that could rate with some of the best in SA. The pupils sang passionately while radiating smiles as broad as the ocean.
The relationship between teacher and children was one of trust. They moved from one rendition to the next, showing off their prowess.
Thereafter, we visited another school to witness a teacher instructing kids to reproduce different art forms. As we walked around watching the kids drawing pictures, the range of quality was astounding.
We picked up immediately which kids had perceptual difficulties and which ones excelled. This helped teachers with referrals to social workers.
The next stop was another arts project where the teacher and pupils adorned the art room with mosaic tiles into an aesthetically pleasing space.
There, the teacher demonstrated to young kids how to reproduce a stillewe by showing them a real “still life” painting and one recreated on the table with vases filled with flowers, surrounded by onions.
The piece de resistance came at the end of our fieldwork. A visit to a marimba class showed beginners emulating older students with finesse.
Later, five older pupils joined them, hungry and tired from having walked some distance in the heat. They gave a splendid performance, justifying the prize won last year in a national competition.
Betsie, Melissa, Salome and headmistress Mrs Du Plooy may be white, but their place in the pantheon of SA’s national treasures is etched in the heavens

Sunday, March 6, 2016

Whites Not Welcome In DA






MAIMANE CONFIRMS WHAT WE’VE BEEN SAYING ALL ALONG
We have been saying for a long time that the DA is not a party prepared to recognize the differences between people. During the electoral campaign this morning, Mmusi Maimane spoke at Richmond Hill in the Nelson Mandela Bay Council where he said that the DA is not a white party.
Maimane said ALL other parties in South Africa are undermining democracy by undermining the Rainbow Nation, which is the legacy of Nelson Mandela.
In fact, Maimane said nothing about the DA which we have not been saying all the time. And therefore Maimane confirmed why the person of European descent with a western value system cannot become part of the DA’s concept for the future of South Africa.

Friday, March 4, 2016

Why do some whites have to apologise for being white?

Saul


Why do some whites have to apologise for being white? Heavens alone know!
Since the incident nearly two weeks ago at the UFS where black thugs and hooligans ran onto the playing field during a rugby match and thus infringed on the rights of the spectators to enjoy their sport of their choice and some spectators decided rightfully so enough was enough, it is significant that it were whites who apologised for the so-called behaviour of the whites. NB: behaviour of whites who reacted on their rights that were infringed and the University or the police dit not bother to protect or restore the whites's infringed rights!!!
The latest white who responded to the "ugly nasty whites who stood up for their rights" is one called Saul Cobbing from UKZN. This idiot was not even there but he is very angry with all whites - because he expects whites to turn the other cheek too. He wrote "An Open Letter To All White South Africans". Read the trash HERE. this is BULLSHIT!!! The time to turn the other cheek is long gone!!
I am white, I never apologised for Apartheid and will never! I will never apologise for being white! I am proud to be white!! I was born here and therefore have the right to be here and nobody, black or white will deny me that right.
Cobbing and the other sorry ass whites must stop with the blame game or the sorry I am white game. Rather start pestering the black hooligans and thugs burning and breaking universities to stop their shit and apologise for destroying my cultural heritage.
And in the mean time, Saul Cobbing go to hell!!!

Thursday, March 3, 2016

Zuma and the Achievements of the ANC since 1994



In a news report Zuma said today that they (ANC) achieved many things since 1994. READ HERE
It is significant that Zuma did not mention one achievement?
No wonder, because there is not one POSITIVE achievement!
What the ANC indeed achieved on the negative side are inter alia the following:
1. A president (yes Zuma) who was accused of rape and corruption and although he was acquitted, still continued  in his post in spite of the  cloud of doubt still hanging over him
2 A president (yes Zuma) who fired one of the most competent and dedicated Ministers of Finance without reason and appointed one of the most incompetent persons as Minister and when the heat was on, fired him and reappointed an ex-Minister with Nene still in the cold
3 A president (yes Zuma) who allowed millions of tax money to be spent on his homestead without batting an eye and allowed senior ministers to lie in public that it was not for his own gain
4 A president (yes Zuma) in public singing and dancing to "Kill the Farmer" while white farmers are murdered daily by black terrorists
5 A president (yes Zuma) on Reconciliation Day after 21 years that ANC took over said that there is no reconciliation because whites are racists
6 The health services of the country were gradually ran into the shit farm
7 The Post Office was gradually ran into the shit farm
8 ESKOM was gradually ran into the shit farm
9 Basis education was gradually ran into the shit farm
10 The SAA was gradually ran into the shit farm
11 Service delivery on Local Government level was ran into the shit farm
12 Mine workers were mowed down by the Police without the ANC caring a damn
13 The country is burning as a result of marches, demonstrations and hooliganism and thugery but ANC don't care a damn
14 The country has been gradually racialised by the ANC and racial tension is on the brink of erruption but ANC don't care
15 The Parliament and universities have been turned into war zones
Do I need say more but that the ANC has ran this country into the shit farm since 1994.
Therefore Zuma, there were no achievements since 1994!!!

Wednesday, March 2, 2016

Mmusi Maimane: Quo Vadis?



Please read my post "Quo Vadis Democratic Alliance."
Recent events have indicated that the man who is suppose to lead the DA out of its political wilderness has lost it.
There are especially three events/issues that are indicative of the fact that Maimane lost it and should throw the towel in.
In the first place, why the hell did he lodge a motion of no confidence for the umpteenth time while he knew that for the umpteenth time it would not succeed? The majority of the ANC is what now? 62%? And how the hell would any ANC MP vote against Zuma? Everyone, including every ANC member in Parliament know that Zuma is pathetic. But (a),  every ANC member knows that if a no confident vote would succeed it would mean the demise of the ANC. And (b), while the Nkandla Village Idiot is at the helm of the South African train smash, they all have carte blanche to do what they want, steal what they want, being as incompetent and useless as they want, because Zuma will not bat an eye! But Maimane wanted to chase after yet another windmill named Zuma!
In the second place, where the hell will Maimane get jobs for 8.3 million jobless people? With his "jobs for millions" he is on the same level  as the ANC's empty election promises. And he said they must forget formal employment opportunities. Go for informal enterpreurship. Has Maimane ever thought what chaos it will create when 8.3 million entrepeneurs will be set loose on the streets of cities selling sweets, cheap Chinese watches and electronics, reparing exhausts, selling second hand tyres, etc? And the clashes with illegal immigrants already doing these things? What Maimane forgets is that South Afica is a third world country, on the brink to become a fourth world country!
And in the third place, he is quiet about the student revolts and the subsequent hooliganism and thugery and the declaration of civil war against Afikaans and whites. The reason is obvious, he does not want to lose the black votes. There are already the ANC and EFF that are anti-white who will get the anti-white votes!
Mmusi Maimane has lost it, throw in the towel, let the DA be a party for die-hard white liberals! Go back to the ANC and fight Zuma from inside the ANC!

A Jerk Of Politicians - AKA A Jerk Of ANC's



A pride of lions, a gaggle of geese … and here’s how we might classify these groups:
• A brat of boys
• A giggle of girls
• A stagger of drunks
• A tedium of accountants
• A stitch of doctors
• A whine of losers
• A jerk of politicians (AKA a Jerk of ANC's)

Tuesday, March 1, 2016

White Liberals and the Black Democratic Alliance (DA)



Honestly...I am not a racist
By Mike Smith
29th of February 2016
What I always find so disturbing is how white liberals will go out of their way to trample on their fellow whites in order to kiss black ass. But every now and again, justice is served.
A few years ago I was a bit perturbed by the Da’s Athol Trollip who called Afrikaners "dumb Dutchmen" and “Nazis”
I mentioned how this utter liberal twat ignored that most of his party’s support came from Afrikaners. I also pointed out that these “Nazi” Afrikaners fought against Nazism in WWII, that they helped Israel develop nuclear weapons and helped Israel during the Yom Kipur war.
Trollip was unapologetic.
However, the wheel turned and Trollip got his just deserts.
You see, Trollip is a farm-boy from the Eastern Cape. He speaks three black languages including fluent Xhosa. He grew up on Mount Prospect farm near Bedford.
Now seven of his former workers who worked for Grand daddy Athol, daddy Douglas and baby Athol during Apartheid (1975 -2005 ) are saying that they were severely mistreated, called baboons and monkeys and paid far less than minimum wage.
Apparently Trollip used to frequently say to the blacks, “Wenze izinto zobumfene” (you acted like a baboon). They were also forced to address daddy Douglas Trollip as “Master”.
Apparently Trollip also paid a man (David Kota) that worked for him for 30 years and whom he called his “Righthand man” only R15,000 ($1000) as pension.
Workers accuse Athol Trollip of abuse and racism
Of course Trollip is denying everything and going to court.
Athol Trollip says it is all a smear campaign
Sure, I won’t be surprised if it is indeed a “dirty tricks” campaign of his ANC opponents.
However what struck me about this liberal twat was how upset he now is that the blacks are all stabbing him in the back.
“They are people I grew up with. They are people who loved me and who I loved. People who respected me and I respected them.”
Aaah…yes. Damascus moment, hey Trollip? Just tell me something…your lawyer…Is he Black or a “Dumb Dutchman”?

Monday, February 29, 2016

Breaking News: The True Story and Origin of Apartheid



Here is the true story/origin of Apartheid!
So the white Afrikaner can stop blaming themselves! And that also apply to the ANC and other blacks. Go blame the British!!!
Hendrik French Verwoerd was born in 1901– got that? He passed away by the hands of the Zionist banking assassins in 1966.
In the year of 1809 the NATIVE PASS LAW of the BRITISH government at the Cape of Good Hope compelled black people to carry a pass book. (Verwoerd was not even born yet.)
In 1865 the British born Sir Theophilis Shepstone PROHIBITED blacks in the province of Natalia to have any voting power.(Verwoerd still was not even born yet)
In 1894 Cecil John Rhodes PREVENTED a colored man- one Krom Hendriks– to join the national cricket tour to England.(Verwoerd was not born yet)
In 1905 Rhodes COMPELLED schools in the Cape Province to SEPARATE white British and black people.(Verwoerd was 4 years old)
In 1913 the British NATIVE LAND ACT 2 prohibited black people to own land.(Verwoerd was 12 years old and still a student)
In 1925 British minister HW Sampson promulgated the act on Labor Demarcation to divide whites and blacks.( Verwoerd was 24 and not a politician yet)
In 1927 the Immorality Act was promulgated in British controlled Natal to prohibit intimacy between black and white.(Verwoerd was 26 and still not into politics)
In 1936 SEPARATE representation in parliament was promulgated by none other than liberal British minion Genl. Jan Smuts.( Verwoerd was 35 – working at a newspaper and not in politics yet)
In 1945 the Native Urban Area Act prohibited blacks to stay for longer than 72 hours in a white urban area.( Verwoerd only then -at the age of 44 - start into politics but had no portfolio to take any decision in parliament yet.)
Lastly the term “Apartheid” was not even used by Verwoerd first- but factually by Dr. DF Malan.
It is quite interesting to take note- that in the year of 1966 when the great man- Hendrik Verwoerd- was murdered- South Africa experienced the healthiest prosperity unknown in South African history. The inflation rate was only 2% and the national growth 7.9%. Verwoerd was deliberately assassinated by the Zionist banking fraternity and the Oppenheimer and Rupert clans to get access to South Africa’s minerals and substantiate a central banking system to control South Africa’s finances and start the first and biggest loan-sharking venture on South African soil- of which Verwoerd was a stern opponent of. Today more than 80% of all South Africans suffer under debt captivation. Verwoerd’s fears were well substantiated.
“Apartheid”
This strong position was achieved by Dr Verwoerd under a policy of separate development -then dubbed “apartheid. “The living standards of blacks were rising at 5,4% per year against that of the Whites at 3,9% per year. In 1965 the economic growth rate was the second highest in the world at 7,9%. The rate of inflation was 2% per annum and the prime interest rate 3% per annum. Domestic savings were so great that South Africa needed no foreign loans for normal economic expansion.A few months before the assassination, the editor of the British periodical Statist, Paul Bareau, wrote: “At the rate at which South Africa is now expanding the term ‘miracle’ is likely to be appropriate to its development over the next few years”. So, the expectations were that in ‘the next few years South Africa, under a policy of separate development (apartheid), would be in a very strong position against any economic or military threat.
His view then was that South Africans will be impoverished by debt if a central banking system ever will be allowed. This is PRECISELY what happened and South Africa currently are so deep in debt with a mere 1.7% growth rate and inflation rate of close to 14% that the scrupulous ANC regime have to make MORE debt from the Zionist loan sharks in order to pay off PREVIOUS debt….the spiral to decay just continuous…JUST as Verwoerd warned. If the poor illiterate South Africans paid more attention to their school classes- and less running around like hooligans in the streets with their “ Liberation before Education” slogans while they burn their schools to ashes- maybe then the likes of thugs like Jacob Zuma would never have entered the political scene and turned South Africa in yet another 3rd world slum.
UNFORTUNATELY the British press already shifted their evil “Apartheid” creation onto Verwoerd and brain-washed the illiterate black masses ( and the complacent ill-informed international world) for 40 years into believing that it was Verwoerd who was the father of “Apartheid”– and keep their bank-rolled lap dogs in the ANC advocating this evil lie on a permanent basis- just in order to keep the division between black and white so-that the British corporate thugs can proceed to plunder our resources and state coffers.Today- under the British created “Democracy“- reversed “Apartheid” is MUCH worse then “Apartheid” itself ever was- with more than 119 racist laws created against white Afrikaners. Yet ‘n stupefied hippocratic British and local media- as well as the international world- all have deliberate attacks of laryngitis.
HERE COMES THE WORST LIE OF ALL: VERWOERD THE “ARCHITECT” OF APARTHEID:
It is ironic that Verwoerd today is branded as a” racist ” when he was the only member of NP government in the 1950s who, as far as I know, is on record explicitly rejecting racist assumptions. In his class notes, as Professor of Sociology at the University of Stellenbosch between 1927 and 1936, he dismissed the idea of biological differences among the ‘big races’, adding that because there were no differences, “this was not really a factor in the development of a higher civilization by the Caucasian race.” He also rejected the notion of different innate abilities. He observed that what appeared to be differences in skills in the case of Europeans and Africans were simply differences in culture due to historical experience.[23]
In the first few weeks of his term as Minister of Native Affairs Verwoerd made an astounding proposal, which historians surprisingly have ignored. It shows that he initially did not intend to limit opportunities for blacks to do advance jobs to the homelands. Verwoerd became Minister for Native Affairs on 19 October 1950, and six weeks later, on 5 December had a meeting took place at his request with the members of the Native Representative Council, which included several leading ANC members. Stating that he expected large numbers of blacks to remain in the big cities for many years, he announced that government planned to give blacks ‘the greatest possible measure of self-government’ in these urban areas. All the work in these townships would have to be done by their own people, enabling blacks to pursue ‘a full life of work and service.’
For this reason, Verwoerd continued, blacks had to be educated to be sufficiently competent in many spheres, the only qualification being that they would have to place their development and their knowledge exclusively at the service of their own people. Verwoerd invited the NRC members to meet him after the session for a ‘comprehensive interview’ about these matters and to put forward proposals, offering a prompt reply from government to their representations.
This was a fateful turning point in South African politics. A new field for black politics could have been opened up if this offer had been accepted, particularly if it set in motion a political process that could have entailed talks between government and the urban black leadership on the election of urban black councils, the formula for the allocation of revenue, the staffing of the local councils’ bureaucracy, property ownership and opportunities for black business. It would have opened up a whole new area for the development of black managerial and administrative capacity, something that country would sorely lack when whites handed over power in 1994.
SO– just WHO was the “architects” and founding fathers of “Apartheid” then? “Apartheid” was created specifically- and still are kept well and alive by these same despots to ram a “guilty” complex down the white Afrikaner’s throat on a daily basis. The Afrikaner are psi-opsed to understand he has no rights no more- and deserve nothing-must feel ashamed of his white skin not to be called a “racist“- and must at a constant basis look after the well being of the previous disadvantaged because of the ” inequities” of the past.
Acknowledgement Alwyn Burger

Saturday, February 27, 2016

Has a War Been Declared On White South Africans?



Has South Africa become most dangerous place you can be outside a war zone?
Nelson Mandela was able to hold the “rainbow nation” together, but he’s passed on. Now, according to the human-rights organization Genocide Watch, South Africa is at pre-genocide stage 6 of 8: “Preparation.”
With the country skidding toward anarchy, naturally, the people want to know whom they should blame. In 2010, a prominent member of the African National Congress named Julius Malema revived an old anti-apartheid song whose lyrics — says Genocide Watch — call for genocide: “Shoot the Boer, shoot, shoot.” “Boer” means “farmer” in Afrikaans; colloquially, it means “white South African.” Malema was ejected from the ANC and convicted of hate speech; he has since formed a new opposition party, the Economic Freedom Fighters, which is currently the third largest party in parliament. Seven months after Malema’s conviction, President Zuma sang the genocide song himself, leading a crowd in a musical chant: “We are going to shoot them with machine guns, they are going to run . . . The cabinet will shoot them, with the machine gun . . . Shoot the Boer, we are going to hit them, they are going to run.”  Nelson Mandela’s successor, the president of South Africa, addresses a crowd of — according to the Guardian — tens of thousands, in a giant stadium, and calls for the murder of what amounts to about 10 percent of his constituents. Among the audience, uniformed members of the military dance.
According to Genocide Watch, the murder rate among South African white farmers is four times higher than among South Africans en masse. That rate increased every month after President Zuma sang his song, for as long as accurate records are available: The police have been ordered to stop reporting murders by race. The police have also disarmed and disbanded groups of farmer-minutemen, organized to provide mutual security. Consequently, says Genocide Watch, “their families” have been “subjected to murder, rape, mutilation and torture.” Meanwhile, “high-ranking ANC government officials . . . continuously refer to Whites as ‘settlers.’”
White South Africans have been native for more than 350 years; whites were farming South Africa before Newton discovered gravity. If, however, no length of time erases the stain of colonization, it should be noted that the dominant Bantu peoples of today’s South Africa displaced the Khoisan peoples who lived in South Africa before them. The archaeological record, evidently, is unclear — but it seems that the first Bantu appeared in what is now South Africa about 400 years before the first European. A long time, but not time immemorial.

Thursday, February 25, 2016

The Blunders by The ANC Government Have Reached New Heights!

The South African minister of defense has accused pilots who left the Air Force of taking planes with them and putting them in museums, which is why there are no planes for today’s pilots to train in.
Minister Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula made the accusation in parliament on Tuesday (23 February). She was replying to a question about why Air Force pilots were being sent to Cuba and Russia to train.
“I tell you that some of the aircraft were taken by some of the people who left the Air Force and they belong to them in their museum,” she was quoted in news reports as saying.
“Actually it started ages ago and some of the people stole some of the assets of the people and left with them. So when you talk about shortages it has to do with the fact that some of the assets were stolen.”
There was no evidence provided of who stole the planes or when, or what museums they went to.
NOTE: No wonder SA is already down the shit farm!

Wednesday, February 24, 2016

Jonathan Jansen Taking the Side of the EFF Black Thugs at the University of the Free State




This is the pathetic response of Jonathan Jansen, Vice-Chancellor of the University of the Freestate after the incident of 22 February when EFF thugs invaded the the playing field during a rugby match and spectators had to remove the thugs from the playing as they infringed on their right to enjoy their sport.
Read all about how Jansen covered for the thugs and told the the spectators, whites, that they actually infringed on the right of the black EFF thugs:
"University of Free State Vice Chancellor Jonathan Jansen said on Tuesday that the brawl between protesters and spectators at the Shimla Park rugby stadium had opened up old wounds.
"Monday night's event was a setback for transformation, we had made so much progress. The acts of the spectators trampled literally and figuratively the rights of the protesters and opened old wounds," Jansen told reporters in Bloemfontein.
On Monday, a Varsity Cup match between the UFS and Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University (NMMU) was disrupted when protesters and students swarmed the field and took each other on in a massive brawl.
Jansen said the game started at 18:30 and that 17 minutes into the game, a group of protesters decided to disrupt proceedings.
"We condemn this strongly. Nobody had the right to take the law into their own hands. While the protests were illegal and disruptive, it did no harm to the physical well-being of the spectators," Jansen said.
He said his team has been working around the clock to meet the demands of contract workers demanding to be in-sourced, and was hoping to have reached an agreement by now."
Pathetic that Jansen sided with the thugs but no wonder, the thugs were blacks and the spectators whites.
Note: The EFF black thugs had not right to invade the the playing field!

Tuesday, February 23, 2016

Shocking: South Africa needs submarines to deter sharks!


Can this be for real?
You decide!
https://t.co/urpHIRbcVc

Who or What is Behind the Student Revolution/Revolt/Unrest?


Someone asked the question who or what is behind the student revolution: the ANC, EFF, Media, etc.
My opinion is that the ANC have a pact with the EFF to use the universities as revolutionary war zones for the revolution that never happened just before or immediately after 1994.
Why do I say this?
Remember it was never Mandela's or the ANC's intention to have a smooth transition to a democracy where everyone could live in harmony with each other. That is why Mandela was so stubborn to denounce the armed struggled because they wanted a revolution where it would have been "Adieu South Africa" for the whites. But the manner in which De Klerk dealt with the matter and the way in which the West warmed to it, made the arch-terrorist to think twice.
So Mandela and his cronies decided to "give in" for the show, knowing that they would live another day to fight the revolution.
Everything went according to plan for the revolution but Mandela was too stubborn to die and Mad Max Zuma became president by means of the now well-known palace revolution.
So, while the ANC brain trust was planning for the delayed revolution and adieu South Africa party for the whites, Zuma lost it all and slowly but surely and then bloody fast, started to bugger up this country. Remember the movie of the 70's "Start the Revolution Without Me?". Zuma was too busy looting that he could not start with it. Then Gwede Mantashe and his cronies decided the revolution should come from outside the ANC to save face. They made a pact with Malema that they would stage a fallout and he would leave and start the EFF, which was just the modernised version of the struggle's MK.
Therefore, the student revolution is the brainchild of the ANC but run by the EFF or modern MK.
Think for yourself, the ANC haven't bat an eye or lifted a finger regarding the spade of student unrests!
And back at the ranch, Zuma enjoys his looting spree while Mantashe and his merry men are planning and executing the adieu South Africa party.
Note: This is entirely based on my own opinion of what is going on in South Africa.

Black stupidity and their Rhodes Must Fall Circus


Probably the best letter I've ever read – how’s the statement “..you’re murdering history.. !?”. It deserves exposure. Distribute it far and wide.
Interestingly, Chris Patten (Lord Patten of Barnes), The Chancellor of Oxford University, was on the Today Programme on BBC Radio 4 yesterday on precisely the same topic. The Daily Telegraph headline yesterday was "Oxford will not rewrite history".
Patten commented "“Education is not indoctrination. Our history is not a blank page on which we can write our own version of what it should have been according to our contemporary views and prejudice"
Rhodes must fall ????
“Dear scrotty students,
Cecil Rhodes’s generous bequest has contributed greatly to the comfort and well being of many generations of Oxford students – a good many of them, dare we say it, better, brighter and more deserving than you.
This does not necessarily mean we approve of everything Rhodes did in his lifetime – but then we don’t have to. Cecil Rhodes died over a century ago. Autres temps, autres moeurs 2. If you don’t understand what this means – and it would not remotely surprise us if that were the case – then we really think you should ask yourself the question: “Why am I at Oxford?”
Oxford, let us remind you, is the world’s second oldest extant university. Scholars have been studying here since at least the 11th century. We’ve played a major part in the invention of Western civilisation, from the 12th century intellectual renaissance through the Enlightenment and beyond. Our alumni include William of Ockham, Roger Bacon, William Tyndale, John Donne, Sir Walter Raleigh, Erasmus, Sir Christopher Wren, William Penn, Rep. Adam Smith (D-WA), Samuel Johnson, Robert Hooke, William Morris, Oscar Wilde, Emily Davison, Cardinal Newman. We’re a big deal. And most of the people privileged to come and study here are conscious of what a big deal we are. Oxford is their alma mater – their dear mother – and they respect and revere her accordingly.
And what were your ancestors doing in that period? Living in mud huts, mainly. Sure we’ll concede you the short lived Southern African civilisation of Great Zimbabwe. But let’s be brutally honest here. The contribution of the Bantu tribes to modern civilisation has been as near as damn it to zilch.
You’ll probably say that’s “racist”. But it’s what we here at Oxford prefer to call “true.” Perhaps the rules are different at other universities. In fact, we know things are different at other universities. We’ve watched with horror at what has been happening across the pond from the University of Missouri to the University of Virginia and even to revered institutions like Harvard and Yale: the “safe spaces”; the
#blacklivesmatter; the creeping cultural relativism; the stifling political correctness; what Allan Bloom rightly called “the closing of the American mind”. At Oxford however, we will always prefer facts and free, open debate to petty grievance-mongering, identity politics and empty sloganeering. The day we cease to do so is the day we lose the right to call ourselves the world’s greatest university.
Of course, you are perfectly within your rights to squander your time at Oxford on silly, vexatious, single-issue political campaigns. (Though it does make us wonder how stringent the vetting procedure is these days for Rhodes scholarships and even more so, for Mandela Rhodes scholarships) We are well used to seeing undergraduates – or, in your case – postgraduates, making idiots of themselves. Just don’t expect us to indulge your idiocy, let alone genuflect before it. You may be black – “BME” as the grisly modern terminology has it – but we are colour blind. We have been educating gifted undergraduates from our former colonies, our Empire, our Commonwealth and beyond for many generations. We do not discriminate over sex, race, colour or creed. We do, however, discriminate according to intellect.
That means, inter alia, that when our undergrads or postgrads come up with fatuous ideas, we don’t pat them on the back, give them a red rosette and say: “Ooh, you’re black and you come from South Africa. What a clever chap you are!”1 No. We prefer to see the quality of those ideas tested in the crucible of public debate. That’s another key part of the Oxford intellectual tradition you see: you can argue any damn thing you like but you need to be able to justify it with facts and logic – otherwise your idea is worthless.
This ludicrous notion you have that a bronze statue of Cecil Rhodes should be removed from Oriel College, because it’s symbolic of “institutional racism” and “white slavery”. Well even if it is – which we dispute – so bloody what? Any undergraduate so feeble-minded that they can’t pass a bronze statue without having their “safe space” violated really does not deserve to be here. And besides, if we were to remove Rhodes’s statue on the premise that his life wasn’t blemish-free, where would we stop? As one of our alumni Dan Hannan has pointed out, Oriel’s other benefactors include two kings so awful – Edward II and Charles I – that their subjects had them killed. The college opposite – Christ Church – was built by a murderous, thieving bully who bumped off two of his wives. Thomas Jefferson kept slaves: does that invalidate the US Constitution? Winston Churchill had unenlightened views about Muslims and India: was he then the wrong man to lead Britain in the war?”
Actually, we’ll go further than that. Your Rhodes Must Fall campaign is not merely fatuous but ugly, vandalistic and dangerous. We agree with Oxford historian RW Johnson that what you are trying to do here is no different from what ISIS and the Al-Qaeda have been doing to artefacts in places like Mali and Syria. You are murdering history.
And who are you, anyway, to be lecturing Oxford University on how it should order its affairs? Your #rhodesmustfall campaign, we understand, originates in South Africa and was initiated by a black activist who told one of his lecturers “whites have to be killed”. One of you – Sizwe Mpofu-Walsh – is the privileged son of a rich politician and a member of a party whose slogan is “Kill the Boer; Kill the Farmer”; another of you, Ntokozo Qwabe, who is only in Oxford as a beneficiary of a Rhodes scholarship, has boasted about the need for “socially conscious black students” to “dominate white universities, and do so ruthlessly and decisively!”
Great. That’s just what Oxford University needs. Some cultural enrichment from the land of Winnie Mandela, burning tyre necklaces, an AIDS epidemic almost entirely the result of government indifference and ignorance, one of the world’s highest per capita murder rates, institutionalised corruption, tribal politics, anti-white racism and a collapsing economy. Please name which of the above items you think will enhance the lives of the 22,000 students studying here at Oxford.
And then please explain what it is that makes your attention grabbing campaign to remove a listed statue from an Oxford college more urgent, more deserving than the desire of probably at least 20,000 of those 22,000 students to enjoy their time here unencumbered by the irritation of spoilt, ungrateful little tossers on scholarships they clearly don’t merit using racial politics and cheap guilt-tripping to ruin the life and fabric of our beloved university.
Understand us and understand this clearly: you have everything to learn from us; we have nothing to learn from you.
Yours,
ORIEL COLLEGE OXFORD









Monday, February 22, 2016

South Afica Belong to the Whites Too!!!

This letter was written by a black person, Lethu Buthelezi:
White people need to stop apologising for being white, they also need to stop entertaining the racist comments. Being offended by them only fuels the fire of racism, rise above.
Black people need to start taking responsibility for their own progression in life instead of making "white" an accusation.
People of South Africa need to unite and stop being so complacent. We need all the support we can get to fix this mess Zuma has put us in and take our country back! This land is not the Zulu's, Khoisan or Zumas land, its the land of the people of South Africa!
If the ANC, EFF and DA just could have the same sentiments, then SA will be a better place for all!!!!

White People Never Stole Any Land!

Not so long ago Zuma tried to stir up anti-white hatred by accusing whites that they stole land from the blacks. Zuma and everyone know this is a bullshit story!
Here is the truth:
"The ANC and its government have created a narrative which portrays white farmers as thieves of land that rightfully belongs to the indigenous people of this country. Although these farmers benefited from the apartheid system, it’s disingenuous to attribute the 1913 Land Act to them; they were not yet born. On the other hand, the government’s bad public policy and corruption are responsible for escalating poverty in SA. It’s unfair to blame white farmers for the mismanagement of the land restitution; the blame should be attributed to the poor project management within the government. Most of the land that was attained by black farmers through the land restitution process is commercially redundant. The government failed to craft a Local Economic Development (LED) framework that will assist traditional communities to use the land commercially.
The Royal Bafokeng and Bakgatla-ba-Kgafela were able to formulate their own LED framework and governance structures. The upshot of this has been impressive economic development by these two traditional communities. My ‘thumb-suck’ estimations are that there are about 10 million beneficiaries of the land restitution policy who could maximise the acquired land commercially and become economically empowered. Interestingly, these people automatically acquired the mining rights when they received the land. It is very clear that the government has no plan for how to assist the people who have already acquired land.
If we are serious about fixing South Africa, we should create a public policy that would enable the ‘boer’ (farmer) to come back to farming and ‘maak ‘n plan’. Experienced farmers (white) and new (mostly black) farmers should work together. Black farmers will bring the land while their experienced counterparts bring their massive experience.
The ANC government and unions should start to appreciate the role of farmers in providing food security and creating jobs. Our public policy should be formulated in such a way that most experienced farmers can still own land because in the absence of land, banks won’t give them funding. Actually, all farmers should be given financial support and subsidies regardless of their race.
While the Asian countries and Europeans appreciate and empower their farmers, here in SA the ANC government treats them with contempt and suspicion; this should stop. Massive economic development in China and Asia were stimulated by a thriving agriculture sector. Growth in agriculture boosts productivity in manufacturing and services sectors – this leads to job creation."
Acknowledgement: Rabelani Dagada

Heritage Day 2018: South Africa

My name is Nigel Olifaut. I am a white South African male, proud to be white with my declaration for Heritage Day 24 September 2018: 1....