Heritage Day 2018: South Africa

My name is Nigel Olifaut. I am a white South African male, proud to be white with my declaration for Heritage Day 24 September 2018:

1. My ancestors fled to South Africa in the 17th Century from France after the revocation of the Edict of Nantes in 1685 and the subsequent persecution of Protestants by the French Government and Catholic Church. We were refugees just like the Muslim refugees now flooding the Western World. The only difference between the the Christian refugees of the 17th century and the Muslim refugees of the 21st century is that we did not come as beggars but to build a new world, we arrived at a new country with determination to create a new world and future for us, not to depend on a government for grants, food, accommodation and to steal, kill, rape, etc. We came here to built a country for all those living in it. Note: History repeats itself. In the 17th century we were persecuted for being Protestants. In the 21 century we are bring persecuted for being white!!! We survived the 17th Century, we will survive the 21st Century!!!!!

Huguenot Monument Paarl South Africa

2. As a fifth generation descendant of the 17^th century immigrants from France to South Africa I was born in South Africa with full citizen rights of  South Africa. I am a citizen of South Africa with equal rights like any other person born here. It is my heritage and nobody, not the ANC, EFF, DA or the ultra-left white and black main stream media houses will deny me my right to be here or to deny me my heritage or what heritage is allowed and what not !

3. All the white immigrants from all the countries in the world who settled in South Africa since 1652 worked together to create a unique language everyone could understand and thus one of the most beautiful languages AFRIKAANS was born in Africa. AFRIKAANS is my Mother Tongue and I am proud of it and it is my right to speak it. Note: It is significant that it was only the settlers from Great Britain that stuck to English and during the periods that Britain governed South Africa or parts of South Africa as a colony they tried their best to kill or surpress my beautiful language with no success. Today the ANC government also try their best to kill or surpress Afrikaans but the more they try, the more Afrikaans will survive. Afrikaans is my heritage, no one, but no one will kill or surpress my language or deny me my right to speak it!!!

4. As a white person I have unique traditions and a beautiful culture and it is part of my heritage and my right to honor it and execute my traditions. It is also my right not to sacrifice my traditions for the sake of an artificial rainbow-concoction of a nation to suit all races and all cultures. My culture, my language, my traditions, my history and my skin color is unique and not negotiable.

5. My heritage is symbols with which I can associate and which is dear to me. One of those symbols is the South African flag which was used from 1928 until 1994. Note: Those idiots that say it is the Apartheid flag is just idiots! This flag was officially hoisted on 31 May 1928 whilst Apartheid only became official government policy since 1948!! How the hell can it be the Apartheid flag??? You can ban or burn my flag, but it will be part of my history and it will be my flag!!! Note: those who claim this flag (1928 to 1994) is a symbol of oppression is high on dagga! Rather, the flag since 1994 became a flag of oppression and suppression for me: changing names of streets and towns that have nothing to do with Apartheid, implementation of Affirmative Action which is worse than “whites only policies” of Apartheid, implementation of BEE, the destruction of monuments and statuettes which are part of my cultural-history, attacking my language Afrikaans as language of instruction in schools, colleges and universities, etc.

My Flag 1928 to 1994

6. As a white South African I have a right to my history which include cultural history. I agree my history has some dark moments but why blame me? You can only blame me if I have direct cause to that dark history? Wasn’t it one of the reasons that the majority whites voted against the continuation of Apartheid in 1992??? Note: My history is my right, whether it was good or bad. You cannot erase history. But to persecute whites for Apartheid?? Go to hell ANC!! Note: The way the ANC government is governing South Africa and the raw deal we as whites got, I am now sorry for being a sucker to believe FW de Klerk and voting yes!!!!

This is my declaration on the eve of Heritage Day of South Africa 2018. I am a citizen of South Africa. No one, not the ANC or Malema or a Max Du Preez, Adriaan Basson, etc. will deny my right to my citizenship, my heritage, my history, my traditions, my Afrikaans, my religion, my symbols, my flag, my land and my right to life.

I am proud to be white, I am not ashamed of Apartheid except if anyone can charge me with specific crimes I committed during Apartheid. I have the right to association and that also means to who I marry, be friends with, etc. So do not force integration down my throat.

My right to braai on heritage day

So, what will I do on heritage day? Mingle with persons of my kind and color, have a braai, reminiscence about when it was still a nice place to live in, hoist my beautiful flag, sing my beautiful anthem (Die Stem) en vloek die moere wat hierdie land so opfok!!!

 Thank you and fok julle (ook die ver-linkse wittes) wat teen wittes is!!!

Nigel Olifaunt (@GautengNigel)

The Freedom the ANC Fought for Many Moons

In the days of Apartheid whites had first class wagons and blacks second class. The difference was cheaper tickets. Today the ANC calls this first class. A dangerous ride in democracy. Together we move forward.
Acknowledgement: @jcos01: Twitter

The Lost Youth of 1976

Tomorrow (16 June 2017) is Youth Day.

Before I continue, read the post I wrote for Youth Day 2015 – Nothing has changed what I wrote then, except that our country is now even more messed up than in 2015!

So, tomorrow Zuma, the ANC and other Party members will once again praise the lost youth of 1976 for their contribution towards the struggle, the fall of Apartheid, the fall of Bantu Education, the fall of  Afrikaans as medium in schools, etc., etc., etc.!

If the youth of 1976 were such heroes of the struggle, ask yourself the follow questions:

• Why is the education system of 2017 in such a mess?

• Why is it that schools where Afrikaans is still the medium of learning are still leaders in quality education?

• What have the youth of 1976 who should now be in their forties done to enhance quality of governance in South Africa?

• Why are you keeping a political bankrupt President and his party in charge of the country?

• Why are you turning a blind eye to state and public enterprise capture?

• You have spoken out and acted against Apartheid, why don’t you speak out and act against corrupt politicians and public officials of 2017?

• Why did you allow the destruction of everything that was good in South Africa?

• Why is South Africa more than 40 years after you “revolution” junk status?

There are still many questions but these will suffice, the answer to all these questions and many not asked is that you are a lost generation, just like the ANC is a lost political party and thus, South Africa is a lost country and civilization!

Enjoy your public holiday tomorrow, next year we will talk again and we will be just further into the junk!

Danie

The Apartheid System Of The Whites Replaced By The Apartheid System Of The ANC

WHEN APARTHATE REPLACED APARTHEID
For a number of decades now the ANC dressed themselves as a “liberation movement” opposed to the policy of apartheid.
They opposed the relocation of people by force in District Six and elsewhere, yet they develop the property reform act which means that farmers will be forced to relocate from their property and they remove the impoverished white families to Munsieville to live on an old rubbish dump.
They opposed the fact that only some South Africans were allowed to vote in elections under apartheid rule, yet they propose to remove voter’s from the roll whose addresses cannot be confirmed. Question is: would “Hut number 4 behind the rubbish heap when you turn left at the chicken coop behind the 63rd spaza shop in the gravel road that runs from the back of the taxi rank when you climb over the wall” count as a legal address or will 22 De la Rey Ave be the one to be removed?
They opposed apartheid legislation listing people as unwanted opponents of the state, yet they propose a law to list people at random as being “racists” and punishing them.
They opposed the “racism” of apartheid, yet they create 119 racially based laws including Affirmative Action and BEE to impoverish the country to the brink of junk status.
They opposed the substandard Bantu Education of apartheid, yet their own youth are burning down universities and centres of education and manage to create the poorest education system in the world.
They opposed the fact that apartheid did nothing towards nation building, yet they allow the massacre of the minority of the nation.
They complained of apartheid using government funds for defence and other purposes and for not building anything, yet they use government funds for Nkandla and destroy what has been built already.
What has changed? Nothing. We are living the mirror image of apartheid, only now it is more bloody and more racist and more destructive than what they claimed the first to be.
Which makes one ponder the statement made by a well-known Afrikaner activist last year: “Black people created apartheid. Go figure.”
Daniel Lötter
FNSA Information.
2 hours ago · Public · in Timeline Photos

Rhoda Kadalie Having her Say about White Privelege

Their commitment makes nonsense of this notion of ‘white privilege’ and ‘whiteness’ in our racist discourse today.
Let me put my cards on the table. I hate the rhetoric from protesting students about “black pain”, “white privilege” and “whiteness”.
They are hellbent on stirring up violence, division and disruption to their education just because they have to work. Yes, they need to work like all of us black students had to under apartheid.
There was no national student fund for us, accommodation was scarce and we did menial tasks to get through higher education. It is time the protesters admit their rage is about the battle for the hearts and minds of the student vote since the Democratic Alliance Student Organisation is unexpectedly taking over student representative councils, not least because of the dishevelment of many of them.
Of course, students struggle and there are accommodation issues. And yes, universities are alienating. But that is part of becoming an adult.
Our protesting students avoid adulthood and are poor role models for kids at school, who are keen to succeed.
What do they see? Students burning art, smashing pianos and burning down libraries and labs. This week, I spent an entire day evaluating a rural music and arts project with my team in the farmlands of Grabouw.
I discovered four white women who, in my estimation, should receive an international award for doing national development work government should be doing. Their commitment makes nonsense of this notion of “white privilege” and “whiteness” in our racist discourse today.
These Mother Teresas share with a dedication unmatched their music and arts expertise with local children. The first stop was Pineview Primary.
In a small prefab classroom, about 60 kids sang in a choir that could rate with some of the best in SA. The pupils sang passionately while radiating smiles as broad as the ocean.
The relationship between teacher and children was one of trust. They moved from one rendition to the next, showing off their prowess.
Thereafter, we visited another school to witness a teacher instructing kids to reproduce different art forms. As we walked around watching the kids drawing pictures, the range of quality was astounding.
We picked up immediately which kids had perceptual difficulties and which ones excelled. This helped teachers with referrals to social workers.
The next stop was another arts project where the teacher and pupils adorned the art room with mosaic tiles into an aesthetically pleasing space.
There, the teacher demonstrated to young kids how to reproduce a stillewe by showing them a real “still life” painting and one recreated on the table with vases filled with flowers, surrounded by onions.
The piece de resistance came at the end of our fieldwork. A visit to a marimba class showed beginners emulating older students with finesse.
Later, five older pupils joined them, hungry and tired from having walked some distance in the heat. They gave a splendid performance, justifying the prize won last year in a national competition.
Betsie, Melissa, Salome and headmistress Mrs Du Plooy may be white, but their place in the pantheon of SA’s national treasures is etched in the heavens

Why do some whites have to apologise for being white?

Saul

Why do some whites have to apologise for being white? Heavens alone know!
Since the incident nearly two weeks ago at the UFS where black thugs and hooligans ran onto the playing field during a rugby match and thus infringed on the rights of the spectators to enjoy their sport of their choice and some spectators decided rightfully so enough was enough, it is significant that it were whites who apologised for the so-called behaviour of the whites. NB: behaviour of whites who reacted on their rights that were infringed and the University or the police dit not bother to protect or restore the whites's infringed rights!!!
The latest white who responded to the "ugly nasty whites who stood up for their rights" is one called Saul Cobbing from UKZN. This idiot was not even there but he is very angry with all whites - because he expects whites to turn the other cheek too. He wrote "An Open Letter To All White South Africans". Read the trash HERE. this is BULLSHIT!!! The time to turn the other cheek is long gone!!
I am white, I never apologised for Apartheid and will never! I will never apologise for being white! I am proud to be white!! I was born here and therefore have the right to be here and nobody, black or white will deny me that right.
Cobbing and the other sorry ass whites must stop with the blame game or the sorry I am white game. Rather start pestering the black hooligans and thugs burning and breaking universities to stop their shit and apologise for destroying my cultural heritage.
And in the mean time, Saul Cobbing go to hell!!!

Breaking News: The True Story and Origin of Apartheid

Here is the true story/origin of Apartheid!
So the white Afrikaner can stop blaming themselves! And that also apply to the ANC and other blacks. Go blame the British!!!
Hendrik French Verwoerd was born in 1901– got that? He passed away by the hands of the Zionist banking assassins in 1966.
In the year of 1809 the NATIVE PASS LAW of the BRITISH government at the Cape of Good Hope compelled black people to carry a pass book. (Verwoerd was not even born yet.)
In 1865 the British born Sir Theophilis Shepstone PROHIBITED blacks in the province of Natalia to have any voting power.(Verwoerd still was not even born yet)
In 1894 Cecil John Rhodes PREVENTED a colored man- one Krom Hendriks– to join the national cricket tour to England.(Verwoerd was not born yet)
In 1905 Rhodes COMPELLED schools in the Cape Province to SEPARATE white British and black people.(Verwoerd was 4 years old)
In 1913 the British NATIVE LAND ACT 2 prohibited black people to own land.(Verwoerd was 12 years old and still a student)
In 1925 British minister HW Sampson promulgated the act on Labor Demarcation to divide whites and blacks.( Verwoerd was 24 and not a politician yet)
In 1927 the Immorality Act was promulgated in British controlled Natal to prohibit intimacy between black and white.(Verwoerd was 26 and still not into politics)
In 1936 SEPARATE representation in parliament was promulgated by none other than liberal British minion Genl. Jan Smuts.( Verwoerd was 35 – working at a newspaper and not in politics yet)
In 1945 the Native Urban Area Act prohibited blacks to stay for longer than 72 hours in a white urban area.( Verwoerd only then -at the age of 44 - start into politics but had no portfolio to take any decision in parliament yet.)
Lastly the term “Apartheid” was not even used by Verwoerd first- but factually by Dr. DF Malan.
It is quite interesting to take note- that in the year of 1966 when the great man- Hendrik Verwoerd- was murdered- South Africa experienced the healthiest prosperity unknown in South African history. The inflation rate was only 2% and the national growth 7.9%. Verwoerd was deliberately assassinated by the Zionist banking fraternity and the Oppenheimer and Rupert clans to get access to South Africa’s minerals and substantiate a central banking system to control South Africa’s finances and start the first and biggest loan-sharking venture on South African soil- of which Verwoerd was a stern opponent of. Today more than 80% of all South Africans suffer under debt captivation. Verwoerd’s fears were well substantiated.
“Apartheid”
This strong position was achieved by Dr Verwoerd under a policy of separate development -then dubbed “apartheid. “The living standards of blacks were rising at 5,4% per year against that of the Whites at 3,9% per year. In 1965 the economic growth rate was the second highest in the world at 7,9%. The rate of inflation was 2% per annum and the prime interest rate 3% per annum. Domestic savings were so great that South Africa needed no foreign loans for normal economic expansion.A few months before the assassination, the editor of the British periodical Statist, Paul Bareau, wrote: “At the rate at which South Africa is now expanding the term ‘miracle’ is likely to be appropriate to its development over the next few years”. So, the expectations were that in ‘the next few years South Africa, under a policy of separate development (apartheid), would be in a very strong position against any economic or military threat.
His view then was that South Africans will be impoverished by debt if a central banking system ever will be allowed. This is PRECISELY what happened and South Africa currently are so deep in debt with a mere 1.7% growth rate and inflation rate of close to 14% that the scrupulous ANC regime have to make MORE debt from the Zionist loan sharks in order to pay off PREVIOUS debt….the spiral to decay just continuous…JUST as Verwoerd warned. If the poor illiterate South Africans paid more attention to their school classes- and less running around like hooligans in the streets with their “ Liberation before Education” slogans while they burn their schools to ashes- maybe then the likes of thugs like Jacob Zuma would never have entered the political scene and turned South Africa in yet another 3rd world slum.
UNFORTUNATELY the British press already shifted their evil “Apartheid” creation onto Verwoerd and brain-washed the illiterate black masses ( and the complacent ill-informed international world) for 40 years into believing that it was Verwoerd who was the father of “Apartheid”– and keep their bank-rolled lap dogs in the ANC advocating this evil lie on a permanent basis- just in order to keep the division between black and white so-that the British corporate thugs can proceed to plunder our resources and state coffers.Today- under the British created “Democracy“- reversed “Apartheid” is MUCH worse then “Apartheid” itself ever was- with more than 119 racist laws created against white Afrikaners. Yet ‘n stupefied hippocratic British and local media- as well as the international world- all have deliberate attacks of laryngitis.
HERE COMES THE WORST LIE OF ALL: VERWOERD THE “ARCHITECT” OF APARTHEID:
It is ironic that Verwoerd today is branded as a” racist ” when he was the only member of NP government in the 1950s who, as far as I know, is on record explicitly rejecting racist assumptions. In his class notes, as Professor of Sociology at the University of Stellenbosch between 1927 and 1936, he dismissed the idea of biological differences among the ‘big races’, adding that because there were no differences, “this was not really a factor in the development of a higher civilization by the Caucasian race.” He also rejected the notion of different innate abilities. He observed that what appeared to be differences in skills in the case of Europeans and Africans were simply differences in culture due to historical experience.[23]
In the first few weeks of his term as Minister of Native Affairs Verwoerd made an astounding proposal, which historians surprisingly have ignored. It shows that he initially did not intend to limit opportunities for blacks to do advance jobs to the homelands. Verwoerd became Minister for Native Affairs on 19 October 1950, and six weeks later, on 5 December had a meeting took place at his request with the members of the Native Representative Council, which included several leading ANC members. Stating that he expected large numbers of blacks to remain in the big cities for many years, he announced that government planned to give blacks ‘the greatest possible measure of self-government’ in these urban areas. All the work in these townships would have to be done by their own people, enabling blacks to pursue ‘a full life of work and service.’
For this reason, Verwoerd continued, blacks had to be educated to be sufficiently competent in many spheres, the only qualification being that they would have to place their development and their knowledge exclusively at the service of their own people. Verwoerd invited the NRC members to meet him after the session for a ‘comprehensive interview’ about these matters and to put forward proposals, offering a prompt reply from government to their representations.
This was a fateful turning point in South African politics. A new field for black politics could have been opened up if this offer had been accepted, particularly if it set in motion a political process that could have entailed talks between government and the urban black leadership on the election of urban black councils, the formula for the allocation of revenue, the staffing of the local councils’ bureaucracy, property ownership and opportunities for black business. It would have opened up a whole new area for the development of black managerial and administrative capacity, something that country would sorely lack when whites handed over power in 1994.
SO– just WHO was the “architects” and founding fathers of “Apartheid” then? “Apartheid” was created specifically- and still are kept well and alive by these same despots to ram a “guilty” complex down the white Afrikaner’s throat on a daily basis. The Afrikaner are psi-opsed to understand he has no rights no more- and deserve nothing-must feel ashamed of his white skin not to be called a “racist“- and must at a constant basis look after the well being of the previous disadvantaged because of the ” inequities” of the past.
Acknowledgement Alwyn Burger

ANC are Hostages!

The ANC are hostages to history, although triumphant in their so-called Struggle, the people they liberated are still queuing for hand-outs (houses, jobs, electricity, food, water, free university fees, tampons, condoms, etc.), and instead they still condemn the Whites as Apartheid ogres!

And it is this same history that will judge them as failures, just like the rest of Africa's liberators were failures!

Get a life, ANC!

What is South Africa’s Answer to Murphy’s Law?

South Africa loves excuses. South Africa loves to blame. You all know Murphy’s Law?  Well here is South Africa’s Law - “If anything can go wrong, it will always be someone else’s fault.”

So, if something goes wrong in South Africa, it is always either Apartheid’s fault or the Whites’ fault.

And in rugby, when your team loses, it is always the referee’s fault.

There you have it, South Africa’s  own version of Murphy’s Law.M