Heritage Day 2018: South Africa

My name is Nigel Olifaut. I am a white South African male, proud to be white with my declaration for Heritage Day 24 September 2018:

1. My ancestors fled to South Africa in the 17th Century from France after the revocation of the Edict of Nantes in 1685 and the subsequent persecution of Protestants by the French Government and Catholic Church. We were refugees just like the Muslim refugees now flooding the Western World. The only difference between the the Christian refugees of the 17th century and the Muslim refugees of the 21st century is that we did not come as beggars but to build a new world, we arrived at a new country with determination to create a new world and future for us, not to depend on a government for grants, food, accommodation and to steal, kill, rape, etc. We came here to built a country for all those living in it. Note: History repeats itself. In the 17th century we were persecuted for being Protestants. In the 21 century we are bring persecuted for being white!!! We survived the 17th Century, we will survive the 21st Century!!!!!

Huguenot Monument Paarl South Africa

2. As a fifth generation descendant of the 17^th century immigrants from France to South Africa I was born in South Africa with full citizen rights of  South Africa. I am a citizen of South Africa with equal rights like any other person born here. It is my heritage and nobody, not the ANC, EFF, DA or the ultra-left white and black main stream media houses will deny me my right to be here or to deny me my heritage or what heritage is allowed and what not !

3. All the white immigrants from all the countries in the world who settled in South Africa since 1652 worked together to create a unique language everyone could understand and thus one of the most beautiful languages AFRIKAANS was born in Africa. AFRIKAANS is my Mother Tongue and I am proud of it and it is my right to speak it. Note: It is significant that it was only the settlers from Great Britain that stuck to English and during the periods that Britain governed South Africa or parts of South Africa as a colony they tried their best to kill or surpress my beautiful language with no success. Today the ANC government also try their best to kill or surpress Afrikaans but the more they try, the more Afrikaans will survive. Afrikaans is my heritage, no one, but no one will kill or surpress my language or deny me my right to speak it!!!

4. As a white person I have unique traditions and a beautiful culture and it is part of my heritage and my right to honor it and execute my traditions. It is also my right not to sacrifice my traditions for the sake of an artificial rainbow-concoction of a nation to suit all races and all cultures. My culture, my language, my traditions, my history and my skin color is unique and not negotiable.

5. My heritage is symbols with which I can associate and which is dear to me. One of those symbols is the South African flag which was used from 1928 until 1994. Note: Those idiots that say it is the Apartheid flag is just idiots! This flag was officially hoisted on 31 May 1928 whilst Apartheid only became official government policy since 1948!! How the hell can it be the Apartheid flag??? You can ban or burn my flag, but it will be part of my history and it will be my flag!!! Note: those who claim this flag (1928 to 1994) is a symbol of oppression is high on dagga! Rather, the flag since 1994 became a flag of oppression and suppression for me: changing names of streets and towns that have nothing to do with Apartheid, implementation of Affirmative Action which is worse than “whites only policies” of Apartheid, implementation of BEE, the destruction of monuments and statuettes which are part of my cultural-history, attacking my language Afrikaans as language of instruction in schools, colleges and universities, etc.

My Flag 1928 to 1994

6. As a white South African I have a right to my history which include cultural history. I agree my history has some dark moments but why blame me? You can only blame me if I have direct cause to that dark history? Wasn’t it one of the reasons that the majority whites voted against the continuation of Apartheid in 1992??? Note: My history is my right, whether it was good or bad. You cannot erase history. But to persecute whites for Apartheid?? Go to hell ANC!! Note: The way the ANC government is governing South Africa and the raw deal we as whites got, I am now sorry for being a sucker to believe FW de Klerk and voting yes!!!!

This is my declaration on the eve of Heritage Day of South Africa 2018. I am a citizen of South Africa. No one, not the ANC or Malema or a Max Du Preez, Adriaan Basson, etc. will deny my right to my citizenship, my heritage, my history, my traditions, my Afrikaans, my religion, my symbols, my flag, my land and my right to life.

I am proud to be white, I am not ashamed of Apartheid except if anyone can charge me with specific crimes I committed during Apartheid. I have the right to association and that also means to who I marry, be friends with, etc. So do not force integration down my throat.

My right to braai on heritage day

So, what will I do on heritage day? Mingle with persons of my kind and color, have a braai, reminiscence about when it was still a nice place to live in, hoist my beautiful flag, sing my beautiful anthem (Die Stem) en vloek die moere wat hierdie land so opfok!!!

 Thank you and fok julle (ook die ver-linkse wittes) wat teen wittes is!!!

Nigel Olifaunt (@GautengNigel)

Is Max Du Preez News24’s Don Quixote?

After reading Max Du Preez’s Opinion on News24, Landreform's Codesa Moment  I had a good laugh because if that piece of crap is not #FakeNewsPar Excellence then the tooth fairy really does exist!

After my good laugh I realised that Max is actually News24’s own Don Quixote. But instead of chasing windmills, Max’s job description is two-fold – number one is to hunt down Afrikaners who according to Max are ultra-right wing (don’t ask Max what is an ultra-right wing Afrikaner, he does not know himself) and number 2 is to counter the reaction of right-minded Afrikaners who “dare” to expose the Government’s incompetence and inadequacy like the current fiasco on EWC they created not on merit but according to pure anti-white sentiments.

It is against the background of the afore-mentioned that I read the crap again and again. After the third time I realised that it is actualy a very good example of what #FakeNews is or what pro-government propaganda is. Remember, I know Max from his day with Vrye Weekblad  when our paths crossed. What he did with Vrye Weekblad he is now doing the same at News24 – “blaas en raas dat die biesies bewe sonder om vorentoe te beweeg.”

Then I dissected his Land reform's Codesa Moment  and identified some big big holes in his story. I compiled a submission to News24 on 28 August 2018 requesting them to obtain information on the allegations/shots in the dark as dear old Max blocked me on social media platforms (experienced have told me that people block you on social media when you expose them with #FakeNews).

My gut feeling told me that News24 won’t publish my submission as it would expose Max and therefore I even provide them with my email address to which Max’s response could be submitted, but to no avail. Therefore I have to follow this avenue:

First of all, read his Land reform's Codesa Moment  here, then again, and then again.

Now read my submission to News24 which is as follows and decide for yourself:

Max, I have read your “Land reform’s Codesa moment” as published on News24 with my tongue in my cheek. My first reaction was, “Max, really, are you serious”? Then I said to myself, “myself, do not be like Max and judge before you ascertain yourself with the truth and nothing but the truth”. So, here it is Max, speak your heart out with facts.

1. You said: Black and white farmers got together with leaders of organised agriculture and agri-business in Limpopo last week and committed to ambitious land reform, something they will likely do more effectively than the state. Question: (1) Please be exact. Who were the leaders of organised agriculture and agri-business who attended?  (2) How many black and white farmers are there in South Africa and how many of each race attended this meeting? If you have it, give us a copy of the attendance list.

2. You said: And all this was achieved without the meddling of right wing lobbyists or Western governments. Question: Please define what is a “right wing lobbyist”.

3. You said: The only thing they have achieved was to seriously offend and annoy the government, the ruling party and most black (and a whole lot of white) citizens. Questions:  Isn’t it true that the pathetic manner in which the government reacted is just proving that the government has a hidden agenda and that they never had any thought to communicating to the people.

4. You said: It is reasonable to conclude that AfriForum's lobbying of the alt-right Fox news channel had directly led to United States (US) president Donald Trump's stupid tweet on South African affairs last week. Question: (1) Please provide us with more substantiated information with this ‘cheap shot in the dark’. (2) How the hell can you make the allegation that Trump made a ‘stupid tweet on South African affairs”?

5. You said: Yesterday the Freedom Front Plus also jumped on the foreign pressure bandwagon. It has written to the United Nations' Human Rights Commission in Geneva to complain against the expropriation proposals. The poor misguided souls. Question: (1) Another shot in the dark – please provide us with the contents of the letter written to the Human Rights Commission. (2) Who the hell are you to call the Freedom Front Plus “poor misguided souls”?

6. You said: I wasn't at the Limpopo meeting, because I addressed some of the country's best dairy farmers on land expropriation in Durban that day. Question: (1) Please provide us with a name list of the dairy farmers attending your meeting, per race. (2) Please provide us with a summary of what you discussed with them/informed them of. (3) Please provide us with you mandate to address the farmers as well as who mandated you.

7. You said: The people who work the land, the political leaders and the senior land affairs officials at the Limpopo meeting clearly feel very differently from the men of AfriForum and IRR in their isolated white bubbles. Question: Please provide us with a record of communication by the government to all white farmers (the entire population for that matter) on how EWC would work as well as the time frame.

8. You said: I have a reasonable suspicion that these two lobby groups are peddling in fear and panic in order to get more members and donations. That would be disgusting and unethical. Question: Put your money where your mouth is and share your suspicions with us.

9. You said: I hear Kriek and Ramphosa hit it off. Perhaps this is a quiet back channel of communication that can only be good for the process. The same goes for Van Zyl and Mabuza. Question: Come on Max, you are not yet a politician (I pray it will never happen) so give us the facts how they ‘hit it off”.

10. You said: Insiders tell me many good relationships started at the summit and that many black and white farmers bonded properly. Question: Once again, come on Max, you can fool some people but not all the people, explain the good relationships please.

Thanks Max, these are all the questions we need better answers/perspective on than your cheap shots in the dark and as we know you since your days with die Vrye Weekblad it is just much said about nothing!

In conclusion: The government, as usual was caught with their pants off and red-faced for them being exposed so they had to counter it with fake news and fake counter schemes and who better than dear old Max and his master, Media 24 to try to get the ‘drol uit die drink water’.

Danie de Villiers

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Not for publishing but for Max’s info should you decide not to publish.

PS: If you masters are not prepared to publish this questions and your answers, please provide it then confidential to danie....@yahoo.com

White Dog Eating White Dog in South Africa

Whites in general are almost daily bombarded by anti-white propaganda and accused of racism, anti-loyalty towards South Africa and subjected to racial discrimination like never before.

By this time I am used to this and one must borne in mind  that the ANC-government since 1994 ran this country into a shithole and to justify their own incompetence and failure to manage South Africa appropriately and their lack of good governance they launched a  propaganda war against whites.

But what is unacceptable is that white liberals in South Africa launched the same propaganda war against whites that are not prepared to turn the other cheek for blacks like the ANC and EFF.  Their main agenda is just to "kruip gat" by them thinking that they will be spared the gun like Malema said more than once and nothing happened to him!.

Here is one right-minded white person's reaction to a liberal white man's tirade against Afrikaans speaking whites:

Commentary:
The same idiots taking on Afrikaans speaking whites, like to dig up skeletons against whites prior to 1994. For these idiots I just want to say that you had your chance just after 1994 with the TRC to bring Apartheid atrocities in the open. If you had not, then just shut up and hold your peace for ever. It is also significant that these same idiots are quiet, very quiet about ANC atrocities pre-1994 and post-1994.  

I also take my hat off for those Afrikaans speaking whites who are not prepared to take any shit from liberal whites! 

Well done Willem Petzer!!!!!!

President Donald Trump vs Cyril Ramaphosa

Mr. Herman Mashaba, Executive Mayor of Johannesburg (DA) caused a little sh*t storm in a tea cup when he tweeted a photo-comparison between President Donald Trump and Cyril Ramaphosa of South Africa yesterday (13 August 2018:

As usual, the ANC and all liberals were up in arms but as we have learned by now, when the ANC and liberals are up in arms about something that concern them, you know for certain it is the truth.

Well done Mr. Mashaba - go you good thing go!

The Freedom the ANC Fought for Many Moons

In the days of Apartheid whites had first class wagons and blacks second class. The difference was cheaper tickets. Today the ANC calls this first class. A dangerous ride in democracy. Together we move forward.
Acknowledgement: @jcos01: Twitter

ANC Government Exposed! They Love Our Colonial Heritage!

The ANC has been exposed big time - they actually love our colonial heritage, although they will never admit it! Real one-eyed Jacks! With one eye they denounce colonialism and  persecute anyone that are positive about colinialism. They even promote a process of decolonialism to rid South Africa from its colonial heritage! But behind the facade they created they actually love colonialism!

This charade by the ANC was once again highlighted with the current (2018) Commonwealth Games. They support and allow our participation but are then quiet about the racist colonial past. If they are sincere in their so-called crusade to rid South Africa from its colonial past, why not start with decolonising us from participating in the Commonwealth Games?

Remember Zuma with the 2010 Soccer World Cup in South Africa where the idiot announced publicly that soccer is a real African game? Nobody wanted to correct the idiot that it originated in England because they were afraid that he would commit suicide!

My Fellow White South Africans Brace Yourselves For Another Human Rights Day

My fellow white South Africans, please brace yourself for yet another omslaught from the ANC and EFF as well as like minded black persons and white libtards like Pieter Howes, Johan Pienaar and Co. on Human Rights Day on 21 March 2018!

By now it is no surprize for us that whites do not have any rights in South Africa and the latest right that was taken away  by Frog In The Water Cyril Ramaphosa was our right to own property.

Also remember that it is actually a right to be deemed innocent of a crime until it is proven that you are actually guilty - but in the case of whites we are guilty of stealing land although the useles government can not provide one tiny bit of evidence that any white farmer ever stole the farm they are farming on!

So, with all due respect to my language, on 21 March 2018 all guns blazing will be coming for the whites. For instance, The Nelson Mandela Foundation already fired a first shot in this war against white rights by applying that the beautiful old flag should be banned. Then it will be banning Afrikaans, The Stem, etc., until the last bastion namely all whites will be banned! I personally think that whites have already been banned, is that why it is open season to kill farmers? I think it is like the old West where a bounty was placed on a criminal's life and the first one that could kill him received a monetary reward. Now they just kill whites for the fun of it. So fuck the ANC, fuck the EFF, I am here to stay and I will fight till my last breath on this earth!

Visionary Statesman or Terrorist?

A picture is worth a thousand words.  Was this man a visionary statesman or just a terrorist?

I think the latter is what he was. Before you answer the question for yourself, read this news item first: Amnesty for Zuma?

If he was a visionary statesman, would this the be the status of the leader of South Africa? No!

If he was a visionary statesman he would ensure that his ANC leaders would be equipped to continue the legacy he himself established since 1994 until he departed from the public arena.

It is scandalous that the President of the country is a criminal and that the ANC has the audacity to think in the direction of getting him amnesty for all the charges against him!!!!

The Naked Reality of Youth Day 2017 in South Africa

Earlier today (16 June 2017) I took a stroll to Shoprite in Putfontein Road Cloverdene to buy bread.

When I was on my way back in Cloverdene Road a young boy (later introduced as July) greeted me friendly in Afrikaans and asked 'My baas R5 vir 'n brood asseblief' clapping his hands together pleading.

When asked how old he is and if he is in school July responded that he is 19 years old and not in school but he has passed 'form 6', whatever it maybe, I assumed it is standard 6 or grade 8 as it is called now?

When I told him I don't give money to beggars, he asked for a job. Then I told him that he should join the club - Myself are too white, too male, too qualified and too old to be employed. I could have been nasty and told him to ask the ANC for a job but he would just waste his time. But I referred him to the DA because Mmusi Maimane constantly brag how he and his party would create jobs like no one's business.

The moral of the story is that on  this Youth Day 2017, while the ANC and the DA will try to get some political mileage out of 16 June 1976, the naked reality is that there are youths like July, only speaking Afrikaans to beg for some bread money from a white man, who are worse off than before 1994 and although he has the right to vote and indeed voted last year in the municipal elections, could not better his current situation.

A variation on an old adage: 'While Zuma and his ANC are singing ABBA's "Money, Money, Money", youths like July have a bleak, bleak, bleak future'.

And you cannot blame Jan van Riebeeck for it! Or Apartheid! Or the whites!

PS: When I said my goodbyes to July I gave him half of the bread I bought, but tomorrow he will still be hungry!

Also Read This Post of Yesterday - The Lost Youth

The Lost Youth of 1976

Tomorrow (16 June 2017) is Youth Day.

Before I continue, read the post I wrote for Youth Day 2015 – Nothing has changed what I wrote then, except that our country is now even more messed up than in 2015!

So, tomorrow Zuma, the ANC and other Party members will once again praise the lost youth of 1976 for their contribution towards the struggle, the fall of Apartheid, the fall of Bantu Education, the fall of  Afrikaans as medium in schools, etc., etc., etc.!

If the youth of 1976 were such heroes of the struggle, ask yourself the follow questions:

• Why is the education system of 2017 in such a mess?

• Why is it that schools where Afrikaans is still the medium of learning are still leaders in quality education?

• What have the youth of 1976 who should now be in their forties done to enhance quality of governance in South Africa?

• Why are you keeping a political bankrupt President and his party in charge of the country?

• Why are you turning a blind eye to state and public enterprise capture?

• You have spoken out and acted against Apartheid, why don’t you speak out and act against corrupt politicians and public officials of 2017?

• Why did you allow the destruction of everything that was good in South Africa?

• Why is South Africa more than 40 years after you “revolution” junk status?

There are still many questions but these will suffice, the answer to all these questions and many not asked is that you are a lost generation, just like the ANC is a lost political party and thus, South Africa is a lost country and civilization!

Enjoy your public holiday tomorrow, next year we will talk again and we will be just further into the junk!

Danie

Dealing with White and Black Racism in South Africa – Double Standards?

It is my personal opinion that dealing with white racism/hate speech and dealing with black racism/hate speech in South Africa is not on par and that there are actually double standards in dealing with white racists and black racists. 

Racism and hate speech have no place in South Africa, and whether you are a white, black, yellow, or pink racist, the full velocity of the law must hit you square in the eyes!

But, on 9 June 2017 AfriForum indirectly highlighted this issue of double standards when dealing with anti-white racism and anti-white speech in South Africa – read it here: Maroela Media

In summary, AfriForum laid charges against anti-white racists at the SA Human Rights Commission and the SA Police Service – and “Urlings (Veldtogbeampte by AfriForum) het gesȇ sou die polisie- en SAMRK-klagtes geen oplossing oplewer nie, AfriForum ook die moontlikheid sal oorweeg om siviele ligitasie in te stel teen die persone wat vir die gevoellose plasings verantwoordelik is”.

In view of the above-mentioned, here are just 2 case studies to emphasise my opinion that we have double standards in South Africa:

Case #1: Dealing with anti-white racist Zama Khumalo

‘SAHRC FACILITATES, WELCOMES PUBLIC APOLOGY BY FACEBOOK "RACIST", KHUMALO.

The South African Human Rights Commission facilitated and welcomed the public apology and withdrawal of all hurtful racial statements posted on social media by the young unemployed journalist Zama Khumalo (see Times report).

On 24 January 2013, Khumalo posted a comment on his Facebook page relating to a school bus accident, which took place in the Westedene area of Johannesburg during 1985 where a number of school children tragically lost their lives.

In response to statements made by two different individuals with access to the Khumalo's Facebook page, he made the following additional statement:

"On 27 March 2013, I will send out an invite to invite you to come to the Westedene Dam for a BIG Black Braai, (100% Blacks), fireworks, DJ - Black-People, celebrating their death.. and "we will always celebrate the death of whiteness".

The Commission received thirteen complaints against Khumalo from 6th to 14th February 2013, for these comments made.

The Commission today headed a mediation session between Khumalo and some of the complainants following his racist remarks.

The meeting was attended by the legal representative of Media 24 Limited who are also the complainants in this matter, representatives from the Commission, including its CEO, and the respondent, Mr Khumalo.

The Commission explained the nature of the meeting to Khumalo and the other attendees and the mandate of the Commission in terms of its constitutional obligations.

Khumalo was guided through the form and nature of mediatory proceedings. He was advised that the meeting was not intended to be an adversarial hearing with the objective of determining or apportioning blame, but was instead aimed at reaching a consensus in line with principles of reconciliation, directed at understanding motives, perception, nation building and interests.

Khumalo was provided an opportunity to, among others, provide a background of the events which led up to the posting of his comments on Facebook, his personal experiences including the public response which it had elicited, to express his feelings of remorse and regret towards those affected.

This was with the aim to permit a process which encouraged constructive, responsible forward growth and understanding; to convey and confirm the relief sought by complainants; and to reach agreement regarding the terms to be included in a settlement agreement, finalised by the respective parties and made public through the Commission.

Khumalo expressed acute feelings of remorse and regret about the hurt caused to those affected, to Media 24 Limited and the general public.

In his words Khumalo said:

"I (Zama Khumalo) hereby tender my summary and unequivocal apology to the general public of South Africa, the Commission, each of the complainants and the individuals who were either directly or indirectly affected by the tragic Westedene bus accident including those families who lost loved ones. I acknowledge the hurt and pain that I have caused as a result of the comments made on Facebook, which were made in a state of anger and disappointment. I therefore truly and genuinely apologise for making such statements and I accept the terms of the agreement as more fully set out herein and also undertake from this date onwards to refrain from, by word and / or by deed, conducting myself in a manner associated with hate and hurtful speech or racism such as that contained in my previous comments."

This statement was reciprocated by a statement from one of the complainants [Media 24] accepting the statement, events and sincerity of the apology.

On this basis agreement was reached regarding each term of the settlement process as encompassed in this agreement.

TERMS OF SETTLEMENT

7.1. On a consideration of the age of the respondent, remorse shown, other forms of relief suggested by the complainants, feedback from the complainants regarding the Commission's recommendations and all other relevant factors, the following terms of have been agreed to:

7.1.1. An undertaking for the adoption of the settlement agreement by the respondent;

7.1.2. A public apology to form part of the Commission's settlement as stated hereunder;

7.1.3. A public apology specifically directed to the families of those who lost loved ones during the Westdene Bus Crash, to be posted on the following website: www.westdene1985.co.za;

7.1.4. A public apology on the Facebook page of the respondent;

7.1.5. The settlement agreement to be made public to the media and the complainants;

7.1.6. That the respondent visits the website: www.westdene1985.co.za to take note of some of the photos and articles written about the accident to afford the respondent an opportunity to truly appreciate the trauma caused by the event; and

7.1.7. An undertaking to participate in suitable diversity training programmes or educational workshops, as recommended by the Commission;

7.1.8. That the respondent visits the Westpark Graveyard where many of the children who lost their lives were laid to rest to clean the graves and to place flowers at the tombstones, taking into account the following:

7.1.8.1. The respondent has indicated his need for security during this visit, which the Media 24 representatives undertook to provide in conjunction with monitored support from the Commission.

7.1.9. Further to the terms set out above and specifically requested by Media 24 Limited:

7.1.9.1. That the respondent will not submit any articles / posts / articles / text in respect of Daily Sun, City Press, Sunday Sun or any other Media 24 Limited Publication on the respondent's Facebook, Linkedin, Google, Twitter profiles or on any other website, social media network or platform which would be considered unlawful in South Africa;

7.1.9.2. That the respondent shall, at any stage of submitting articles / posts / articles / text on the respondent's Facebook, Linkedin, Google, Twitter profiles or on any other website, social media network or platform, clearly state the period during which he was employed with Media 24 to avoid the impression that he is currently employed at Media 24 Limited;

7.1.9.3. That the respondent must provide a written undertaking not to publish any further articles / posts / articles / text which are prohibited in South African law regarding the Westdene Dam Tragedy;

7.1.9.4. That the respondent will ensure the removal of all posts and comments published by the respondent on his Facebook page (Zama Khumalo) which are unlawful in terms of South African law;

7.1.9.5. That the respondent will ensure the removal of all unlawful posts and / or comments relating to Media 24 Limited;

7.1.9.6. That the respondent will ensure that the public does not have access to any photographs through his Facebook, Linkedin, Google and / or Twitter profiles or on any other website or social media network or platform which indicate an employment relationship between the respondent and Media 24 Limited;

7.1.9.7. That the respondent provides an unconditional apology to the family and loved ones of every victim of the Westdene Dam Tragedy (which can be done through the following website: www.westdene1985.co.za), the South African Public, Media 24, Daily Sun and City Press.

7.1.9.8. That the apology from the respondent must be published in full on the respondent's Facebook page and that related thereto:

7.1.9.8.1. The respondent will continually monitor all comments made on his Facebook page relating to his apology and will remove all unlawful comments within a reasonable period of time after having been requested to do so by Media 24; and

7.1.9.8.2. Media 24 has undertaken to monitor the Facebook page of the respondent for a reasonable time in the foreseeable future to ensure compliance herewith.

7.1.9.9. That the respondent's apology be made available to Media 24 Limited, to be published on its websites and be provided to SAPA, at its discretion together with a statement urging the South African public not to engage in further conduct of a similar nature;

7.1.9.10. That the respondent attends a diversion / rehabilitation course regarding race relations in South Africa (as per the Commission's proposals).

7.1.10. That subject to the above, the complainants agree to the following:

7.1.10.1. To cease pursuit of all ongoing or intended legal action against the respondent, whether criminal or civil in nature;

7.1.10.2. To regard this agreement as a final settlement of their complaints against the respondent and to desist from any further actions against him arising from the complaint.

The Commission will post the full agreement on to the website dedicated to the victims of the Westdene, www.westdene1985.co.za, and on our websitewww.sahrc.org.za.

Khumalo will as part of the settlement post a formal apology on to his facebook site.

The Commission has noted the increase in violations arising from the abuse of social media platforms and strongly urged the public to make a conscious effort toward eradicating racism.

Statement issued by Isaac Mangena, Head: Communications, SA Human Rights Commission, February 14 2013’

A slap on the wrist I would say!

Case #2: Anti-black racist Penny Sparrow

Firstly, she was criminally charged and convicted:

‘Penny Sparrow fined R5 000 for racist rant

Crime & Courts | 12 September 2016, 3:15pm

Giordano Stolley

Durban - Former KwaZulu-Natal estate agent Penny Sparrow was convicted in the Scottburgh Magistrate’s Court on Monday of crimen injuria in relation to racist comments that she made at the start of the year comparing black people to monkeys.

Former estate agent Penny Sparrow has been convicted of crimen injuria.

Magistrate Vincent Hlatshway handed Sparrow a R5 000 fine, or or 12 months imprisonment.

National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) spokeswoman Natasha Ramkisson-Kara said that Sparrow was sentenced to an additional two years, which was wholly suspended for five years, during which time she must not be convicted of crimen injuria.

She was also ordered to make a public apology for her remarks over the social media platform Facebook – the very platform over which she vented her rage against black South Africans, referring to them as “monkeys”, who if allowed loose on the country’s beaches, would cause “huge dirt and troubles and discomfort to others”.

Sparrow was convicted on her own guilty plea.

The charge against Sparrow was brought by Democratic Alliance member and Black Like Me founder Herman Mashaba.’

Secondly, she was also charged in the Equality Court and fined:

In June 2016, Equality Court Magistrate Irfaan Khalil ruled that Sparrow had to pay R150 000 to the Oliver and Adelaide Tambo Trust to atone for her posting.

In that case Sparrow was also ordered to pay the legal fees of the African National Congress, who brought the matter before the Equality Court. Sparrow did not appear in court for that case, but has appeared on all occasions in connection with the crimen injuria charge.

Compared to Khumalo, I would say she received punishment just short of the death penalty!

There we are, my plea is that racism and hate speech should not be tolerated but then, whether you are a white, black, yellow or pink racist, deal with them equally!

Danie

Jacob Zuma: A President to be Respected?

Commentary: Zuma himself and the ANC expect us to respect Zuma. What they do not understand is that respect is something you have to earn and not something you demand because you are the president. Irrespective of the fact that he turned South Africa into a third rate junk yard, his stupid, idiotic public utterances and the fact that he changes his tune as the wind blows according to  his audience is something laughable. Here are some few examples of how he changed his tune as the wind blows, in other words how he changed his story according to the composition of his audience:

On racism:

Zuma in January 2016 after the ANC's 104th anniversary celebrations in Rustenburg, North West:

"With time, people have tended to exaggerate the issue of racism because they say SA is still a racist country – not true. We defeated racism when we pursued the non-racial society. Our society is a rainbow nation, it's a non-racial society."

vs

Zuma speaking at an event marking the 24th anniversary of the death of anti-apartheid activist Chris Hani in Boksburg in April 2017:

"We have not yet succeeded to build a non-racial society. There is a resurgence of racism in our country."

On homosexuality:

Zuma speaking at the Shaka Day commemoration in KwaDukuza, KwaZulu-Natal, in September 2006:

"Same-sex marriage is a disgrace to the nation and to God… when I was growing up, unqingili [homosexuals] could not stand in front of me."

vs

Zuma in a statement four days later in September 2006:

"I also respect, acknowledge and applaud the sterling contribution of many gay and lesbian compatriots in the struggle that brought about our freedom, and the role they continue to play in the building of a successful non-racial, non-discriminatory South Africa."

On the Afrikaner community:

Zuma during a fundraising gala dinner in Cape Town in January 2015:

"A man with the name of Jan van Riebeeck arrived in the Cape on 6 April 1652... What followed were numerous struggles and wars and deaths and the seizure of land and the deprivation of the indigenous peoples' political and economic power. "The arrival of Van Riebeeck disrupted South Africa's social cohesion, repressed people and caused wars."

vs

Zuma in an interview with Beeld newspaper in February 2011 shortly after being voted president:

"They are the only white group who can lay claim to the fact that they also fought for their freedom, against the Brits... they died in concentration camps. They made a contribution to the development of South Africa and helped make it what it is today. They are an important group. They are the kind of group that doesn't carry two passports, only one."

On God and the ANC:

Zuma during a fundraising gala dinner in Cape Town in January 2015:

"The ANC is on the side of the people and God is on the side of the ANC. We cannot lose."

vs

Zuma during a Black Business Council gala dinner in September 2016:

"No one will ever come from anywhere to help us, only in the olden days God could be sympathetic and send his son to come and help."

On human rights:

Zuma in September 2012 in response to a question in the National Assembly on wage negotiations at Lonmin mine:

"Sorry, we have more rights here because we are a majority. You have fewer rights because you are a minority. Absolutely, that's how democracy works. So, it is a question of accepting the rules within democracy and you must operate in them."

vs

Zuma during the commemoration of Human Rights Day on March 21, 2017, in King William's Town in the Eastern Cape:

"Our country now enjoys a stable constitutional democracy where everyone is entitled to equal human rights because of the sacrifices of the people."

On the use of violence by police:

 Zuma in June 2015 at Tshwane University of Technology's Soshanguve campus while addressing several thousand people during his Siyahlola Presidential Monitoring Programme visit:

"The culture of apartheid that used violence to suppress people will have to be looked at again, and I don't want it. We don't want the police to use violence because they are stopping violence."

vs

Zuma said in September 2015 during a ceremony at the Union Buildings in remembrance of police officers killed in the past year:

"We urge you to defend yourselves with everything at your disposal if you are attacked, within the confines of the law. Our laws allow the police to fight back decisively when their lives or those of the public are threatened."

On the courts and the judiciary:

Zuma during a debate in the National House of Traditional Leaders in Pretoria in April 2016:

"I'll be very happy that we solve the African problems in the African way because if we solve them only legally they become too complicated. Law looks at one side only, they don't look at any other thing. They deal with cold facts and I was complaining [about] that, but they're dealing with warm bodies. That's the contradiction."

vs

Zuma during his keynote address at the Access to Justice Conference in July 2011:

"Judicial independence and the rule of law are the pillars of democratic systems worldwide."

On combatting HIV/Aids:

Zuma said in April 2006 under cross-examination after being charged with the rape of Fezekile Ntsukela Kuzwayo, of which he was ultimately acquitted:

"[A shower] would minimise the risk of contracting the disease [AIDS]."

vs

Zuma in April 2010 after publicly revealing his HIV test results:

"We have to work harder, together, to fight the perceptions and the stigma. We have to expand the knowledge and understanding of the epidemic to protect affected individuals and families."

On Julius Malema:

Zuma in October 2009 during a visit to Malema's hometown of Seshego in Limpopo where the ANC Youth League leader, at the time, had helped to build a house and a church:

"The ANC recognises talent and leadership and we give people an opportunity. Julius has illustrated that he is indeed a good leader and that he understands the people."

vs

Zuma in February 2017 during a TNA Breakfast Briefing in Cape Town after the EFF disrupted his SONA:

"If for an example you are dealing with an organisation that was established by young people who were expelled from the ANC‚ they must be angry with the ANC. They must be trying their level best to fight back but they don't know how. Democracy is not about angry young people. Democracy is about debating things. Debating what we need to do for our country."

On Nkandla:

Zuma said in response to a question by an EFF MP during a parliamentary sitting in March 2015:

"Never have I ever thought on the date when I will pay back the money. Firstly, there is no money that I am going to be paying back without a determination by those who are authorised to do so as recommended by the Public Protector. The Public Protector has not said pay back the money. The Public Protector has said… where [there is] undue benefit to the family or myself, she thinks this money might be paid back. But this should be determined by the minister of police.”

"That determination has not been done. Why do you say I should pay back the money? You don't even know how much."

vs

Zuma in April 2016 after the Constitutional Court's ruling that he had unduly benefited from non-security upgrades to his Nkandla home:

"I have consistently stated that I would pay an amount towards the Nkandla non-security upgrades once this had been determined by the correct authority. I would like to emphasise that it was never my intention not to comply with the remedial action taken against me by the Public Protector or to disrespect her office."