Breaking News: The True Story and Origin of Apartheid

Here is the true story/origin of Apartheid!
So the white Afrikaner can stop blaming themselves! And that also apply to the ANC and other blacks. Go blame the British!!!
Hendrik French Verwoerd was born in 1901– got that? He passed away by the hands of the Zionist banking assassins in 1966.
In the year of 1809 the NATIVE PASS LAW of the BRITISH government at the Cape of Good Hope compelled black people to carry a pass book. (Verwoerd was not even born yet.)
In 1865 the British born Sir Theophilis Shepstone PROHIBITED blacks in the province of Natalia to have any voting power.(Verwoerd still was not even born yet)
In 1894 Cecil John Rhodes PREVENTED a colored man- one Krom Hendriks– to join the national cricket tour to England.(Verwoerd was not born yet)
In 1905 Rhodes COMPELLED schools in the Cape Province to SEPARATE white British and black people.(Verwoerd was 4 years old)
In 1913 the British NATIVE LAND ACT 2 prohibited black people to own land.(Verwoerd was 12 years old and still a student)
In 1925 British minister HW Sampson promulgated the act on Labor Demarcation to divide whites and blacks.( Verwoerd was 24 and not a politician yet)
In 1927 the Immorality Act was promulgated in British controlled Natal to prohibit intimacy between black and white.(Verwoerd was 26 and still not into politics)
In 1936 SEPARATE representation in parliament was promulgated by none other than liberal British minion Genl. Jan Smuts.( Verwoerd was 35 – working at a newspaper and not in politics yet)
In 1945 the Native Urban Area Act prohibited blacks to stay for longer than 72 hours in a white urban area.( Verwoerd only then -at the age of 44 - start into politics but had no portfolio to take any decision in parliament yet.)
Lastly the term “Apartheid” was not even used by Verwoerd first- but factually by Dr. DF Malan.
It is quite interesting to take note- that in the year of 1966 when the great man- Hendrik Verwoerd- was murdered- South Africa experienced the healthiest prosperity unknown in South African history. The inflation rate was only 2% and the national growth 7.9%. Verwoerd was deliberately assassinated by the Zionist banking fraternity and the Oppenheimer and Rupert clans to get access to South Africa’s minerals and substantiate a central banking system to control South Africa’s finances and start the first and biggest loan-sharking venture on South African soil- of which Verwoerd was a stern opponent of. Today more than 80% of all South Africans suffer under debt captivation. Verwoerd’s fears were well substantiated.
“Apartheid”
This strong position was achieved by Dr Verwoerd under a policy of separate development -then dubbed “apartheid. “The living standards of blacks were rising at 5,4% per year against that of the Whites at 3,9% per year. In 1965 the economic growth rate was the second highest in the world at 7,9%. The rate of inflation was 2% per annum and the prime interest rate 3% per annum. Domestic savings were so great that South Africa needed no foreign loans for normal economic expansion.A few months before the assassination, the editor of the British periodical Statist, Paul Bareau, wrote: “At the rate at which South Africa is now expanding the term ‘miracle’ is likely to be appropriate to its development over the next few years”. So, the expectations were that in ‘the next few years South Africa, under a policy of separate development (apartheid), would be in a very strong position against any economic or military threat.
His view then was that South Africans will be impoverished by debt if a central banking system ever will be allowed. This is PRECISELY what happened and South Africa currently are so deep in debt with a mere 1.7% growth rate and inflation rate of close to 14% that the scrupulous ANC regime have to make MORE debt from the Zionist loan sharks in order to pay off PREVIOUS debt….the spiral to decay just continuous…JUST as Verwoerd warned. If the poor illiterate South Africans paid more attention to their school classes- and less running around like hooligans in the streets with their “ Liberation before Education” slogans while they burn their schools to ashes- maybe then the likes of thugs like Jacob Zuma would never have entered the political scene and turned South Africa in yet another 3rd world slum.
UNFORTUNATELY the British press already shifted their evil “Apartheid” creation onto Verwoerd and brain-washed the illiterate black masses ( and the complacent ill-informed international world) for 40 years into believing that it was Verwoerd who was the father of “Apartheid”– and keep their bank-rolled lap dogs in the ANC advocating this evil lie on a permanent basis- just in order to keep the division between black and white so-that the British corporate thugs can proceed to plunder our resources and state coffers.Today- under the British created “Democracy“- reversed “Apartheid” is MUCH worse then “Apartheid” itself ever was- with more than 119 racist laws created against white Afrikaners. Yet ‘n stupefied hippocratic British and local media- as well as the international world- all have deliberate attacks of laryngitis.
HERE COMES THE WORST LIE OF ALL: VERWOERD THE “ARCHITECT” OF APARTHEID:
It is ironic that Verwoerd today is branded as a” racist ” when he was the only member of NP government in the 1950s who, as far as I know, is on record explicitly rejecting racist assumptions. In his class notes, as Professor of Sociology at the University of Stellenbosch between 1927 and 1936, he dismissed the idea of biological differences among the ‘big races’, adding that because there were no differences, “this was not really a factor in the development of a higher civilization by the Caucasian race.” He also rejected the notion of different innate abilities. He observed that what appeared to be differences in skills in the case of Europeans and Africans were simply differences in culture due to historical experience.[23]
In the first few weeks of his term as Minister of Native Affairs Verwoerd made an astounding proposal, which historians surprisingly have ignored. It shows that he initially did not intend to limit opportunities for blacks to do advance jobs to the homelands. Verwoerd became Minister for Native Affairs on 19 October 1950, and six weeks later, on 5 December had a meeting took place at his request with the members of the Native Representative Council, which included several leading ANC members. Stating that he expected large numbers of blacks to remain in the big cities for many years, he announced that government planned to give blacks ‘the greatest possible measure of self-government’ in these urban areas. All the work in these townships would have to be done by their own people, enabling blacks to pursue ‘a full life of work and service.’
For this reason, Verwoerd continued, blacks had to be educated to be sufficiently competent in many spheres, the only qualification being that they would have to place their development and their knowledge exclusively at the service of their own people. Verwoerd invited the NRC members to meet him after the session for a ‘comprehensive interview’ about these matters and to put forward proposals, offering a prompt reply from government to their representations.
This was a fateful turning point in South African politics. A new field for black politics could have been opened up if this offer had been accepted, particularly if it set in motion a political process that could have entailed talks between government and the urban black leadership on the election of urban black councils, the formula for the allocation of revenue, the staffing of the local councils’ bureaucracy, property ownership and opportunities for black business. It would have opened up a whole new area for the development of black managerial and administrative capacity, something that country would sorely lack when whites handed over power in 1994.
SO– just WHO was the “architects” and founding fathers of “Apartheid” then? “Apartheid” was created specifically- and still are kept well and alive by these same despots to ram a “guilty” complex down the white Afrikaner’s throat on a daily basis. The Afrikaner are psi-opsed to understand he has no rights no more- and deserve nothing-must feel ashamed of his white skin not to be called a “racist“- and must at a constant basis look after the well being of the previous disadvantaged because of the ” inequities” of the past.
Acknowledgement Alwyn Burger

Has a War Been Declared On White South Africans?

Has South Africa become most dangerous place you can be outside a war zone?
Nelson Mandela was able to hold the “rainbow nation” together, but he’s passed on. Now, according to the human-rights organization Genocide Watch, South Africa is at pre-genocide stage 6 of 8: “Preparation.”
With the country skidding toward anarchy, naturally, the people want to know whom they should blame. In 2010, a prominent member of the African National Congress named Julius Malema revived an old anti-apartheid song whose lyrics — says Genocide Watch — call for genocide: “Shoot the Boer, shoot, shoot.” “Boer” means “farmer” in Afrikaans; colloquially, it means “white South African.” Malema was ejected from the ANC and convicted of hate speech; he has since formed a new opposition party, the Economic Freedom Fighters, which is currently the third largest party in parliament. Seven months after Malema’s conviction, President Zuma sang the genocide song himself, leading a crowd in a musical chant: “We are going to shoot them with machine guns, they are going to run . . . The cabinet will shoot them, with the machine gun . . . Shoot the Boer, we are going to hit them, they are going to run.”  Nelson Mandela’s successor, the president of South Africa, addresses a crowd of — according to the Guardian — tens of thousands, in a giant stadium, and calls for the murder of what amounts to about 10 percent of his constituents. Among the audience, uniformed members of the military dance.
According to Genocide Watch, the murder rate among South African white farmers is four times higher than among South Africans en masse. That rate increased every month after President Zuma sang his song, for as long as accurate records are available: The police have been ordered to stop reporting murders by race. The police have also disarmed and disbanded groups of farmer-minutemen, organized to provide mutual security. Consequently, says Genocide Watch, “their families” have been “subjected to murder, rape, mutilation and torture.” Meanwhile, “high-ranking ANC government officials . . . continuously refer to Whites as ‘settlers.’”
White South Africans have been native for more than 350 years; whites were farming South Africa before Newton discovered gravity. If, however, no length of time erases the stain of colonization, it should be noted that the dominant Bantu peoples of today’s South Africa displaced the Khoisan peoples who lived in South Africa before them. The archaeological record, evidently, is unclear — but it seems that the first Bantu appeared in what is now South Africa about 400 years before the first European. A long time, but not time immemorial.

The Blunders by The ANC Government Have Reached New Heights!

The South African minister of defense has accused pilots who left the Air Force of taking planes with them and putting them in museums, which is why there are no planes for today’s pilots to train in.
Minister Nosiviwe Mapisa-Nqakula made the accusation in parliament on Tuesday (23 February). She was replying to a question about why Air Force pilots were being sent to Cuba and Russia to train.
“I tell you that some of the aircraft were taken by some of the people who left the Air Force and they belong to them in their museum,” she was quoted in news reports as saying.
“Actually it started ages ago and some of the people stole some of the assets of the people and left with them. So when you talk about shortages it has to do with the fact that some of the assets were stolen.”
There was no evidence provided of who stole the planes or when, or what museums they went to.
NOTE: No wonder SA is already down the shit farm!

Jonathan Jansen Taking the Side of the EFF Black Thugs at the University of the Free State

This is the pathetic response of Jonathan Jansen, Vice-Chancellor of the University of the Freestate after the incident of 22 February when EFF thugs invaded the the playing field during a rugby match and spectators had to remove the thugs from the playing as they infringed on their right to enjoy their sport.
Read all about how Jansen covered for the thugs and told the the spectators, whites, that they actually infringed on the right of the black EFF thugs:
"University of Free State Vice Chancellor Jonathan Jansen said on Tuesday that the brawl between protesters and spectators at the Shimla Park rugby stadium had opened up old wounds.
"Monday night's event was a setback for transformation, we had made so much progress. The acts of the spectators trampled literally and figuratively the rights of the protesters and opened old wounds," Jansen told reporters in Bloemfontein.
On Monday, a Varsity Cup match between the UFS and Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University (NMMU) was disrupted when protesters and students swarmed the field and took each other on in a massive brawl.
Jansen said the game started at 18:30 and that 17 minutes into the game, a group of protesters decided to disrupt proceedings.
"We condemn this strongly. Nobody had the right to take the law into their own hands. While the protests were illegal and disruptive, it did no harm to the physical well-being of the spectators," Jansen said.
He said his team has been working around the clock to meet the demands of contract workers demanding to be in-sourced, and was hoping to have reached an agreement by now."
Pathetic that Jansen sided with the thugs but no wonder, the thugs were blacks and the spectators whites.
Note: The EFF black thugs had not right to invade the the playing field!

Shocking: South Africa needs submarines to deter sharks!

Can this be for real?
You decide!
https://t.co/urpHIRbcVc

Who or What is Behind the Student Revolution/Revolt/Unrest?

Someone asked the question who or what is behind the student revolution: the ANC, EFF, Media, etc.
My opinion is that the ANC have a pact with the EFF to use the universities as revolutionary war zones for the revolution that never happened just before or immediately after 1994.
Why do I say this?
Remember it was never Mandela's or the ANC's intention to have a smooth transition to a democracy where everyone could live in harmony with each other. That is why Mandela was so stubborn to denounce the armed struggled because they wanted a revolution where it would have been "Adieu South Africa" for the whites. But the manner in which De Klerk dealt with the matter and the way in which the West warmed to it, made the arch-terrorist to think twice.
So Mandela and his cronies decided to "give in" for the show, knowing that they would live another day to fight the revolution.
Everything went according to plan for the revolution but Mandela was too stubborn to die and Mad Max Zuma became president by means of the now well-known palace revolution.
So, while the ANC brain trust was planning for the delayed revolution and adieu South Africa party for the whites, Zuma lost it all and slowly but surely and then bloody fast, started to bugger up this country. Remember the movie of the 70's "Start the Revolution Without Me?". Zuma was too busy looting that he could not start with it. Then Gwede Mantashe and his cronies decided the revolution should come from outside the ANC to save face. They made a pact with Malema that they would stage a fallout and he would leave and start the EFF, which was just the modernised version of the struggle's MK.
Therefore, the student revolution is the brainchild of the ANC but run by the EFF or modern MK.
Think for yourself, the ANC haven't bat an eye or lifted a finger regarding the spade of student unrests!
And back at the ranch, Zuma enjoys his looting spree while Mantashe and his merry men are planning and executing the adieu South Africa party.
Note: This is entirely based on my own opinion of what is going on in South Africa.

Black stupidity and their Rhodes Must Fall Circus

Probably the best letter I've ever read – how’s the statement “..you’re murdering history.. !?”. It deserves exposure. Distribute it far and wide.
Interestingly, Chris Patten (Lord Patten of Barnes), The Chancellor of Oxford University, was on the Today Programme on BBC Radio 4 yesterday on precisely the same topic. The Daily Telegraph headline yesterday was "Oxford will not rewrite history".
Patten commented "“Education is not indoctrination. Our history is not a blank page on which we can write our own version of what it should have been according to our contemporary views and prejudice"
Rhodes must fall ????
“Dear scrotty students,
Cecil Rhodes’s generous bequest has contributed greatly to the comfort and well being of many generations of Oxford students – a good many of them, dare we say it, better, brighter and more deserving than you.
This does not necessarily mean we approve of everything Rhodes did in his lifetime – but then we don’t have to. Cecil Rhodes died over a century ago. Autres temps, autres moeurs 2. If you don’t understand what this means – and it would not remotely surprise us if that were the case – then we really think you should ask yourself the question: “Why am I at Oxford?”
Oxford, let us remind you, is the world’s second oldest extant university. Scholars have been studying here since at least the 11th century. We’ve played a major part in the invention of Western civilisation, from the 12th century intellectual renaissance through the Enlightenment and beyond. Our alumni include William of Ockham, Roger Bacon, William Tyndale, John Donne, Sir Walter Raleigh, Erasmus, Sir Christopher Wren, William Penn, Rep. Adam Smith (D-WA), Samuel Johnson, Robert Hooke, William Morris, Oscar Wilde, Emily Davison, Cardinal Newman. We’re a big deal. And most of the people privileged to come and study here are conscious of what a big deal we are. Oxford is their alma mater – their dear mother – and they respect and revere her accordingly.
And what were your ancestors doing in that period? Living in mud huts, mainly. Sure we’ll concede you the short lived Southern African civilisation of Great Zimbabwe. But let’s be brutally honest here. The contribution of the Bantu tribes to modern civilisation has been as near as damn it to zilch.
You’ll probably say that’s “racist”. But it’s what we here at Oxford prefer to call “true.” Perhaps the rules are different at other universities. In fact, we know things are different at other universities. We’ve watched with horror at what has been happening across the pond from the University of Missouri to the University of Virginia and even to revered institutions like Harvard and Yale: the “safe spaces”; the
#blacklivesmatter; the creeping cultural relativism; the stifling political correctness; what Allan Bloom rightly called “the closing of the American mind”. At Oxford however, we will always prefer facts and free, open debate to petty grievance-mongering, identity politics and empty sloganeering. The day we cease to do so is the day we lose the right to call ourselves the world’s greatest university.
Of course, you are perfectly within your rights to squander your time at Oxford on silly, vexatious, single-issue political campaigns. (Though it does make us wonder how stringent the vetting procedure is these days for Rhodes scholarships and even more so, for Mandela Rhodes scholarships) We are well used to seeing undergraduates – or, in your case – postgraduates, making idiots of themselves. Just don’t expect us to indulge your idiocy, let alone genuflect before it. You may be black – “BME” as the grisly modern terminology has it – but we are colour blind. We have been educating gifted undergraduates from our former colonies, our Empire, our Commonwealth and beyond for many generations. We do not discriminate over sex, race, colour or creed. We do, however, discriminate according to intellect.
That means, inter alia, that when our undergrads or postgrads come up with fatuous ideas, we don’t pat them on the back, give them a red rosette and say: “Ooh, you’re black and you come from South Africa. What a clever chap you are!”1 No. We prefer to see the quality of those ideas tested in the crucible of public debate. That’s another key part of the Oxford intellectual tradition you see: you can argue any damn thing you like but you need to be able to justify it with facts and logic – otherwise your idea is worthless.
This ludicrous notion you have that a bronze statue of Cecil Rhodes should be removed from Oriel College, because it’s symbolic of “institutional racism” and “white slavery”. Well even if it is – which we dispute – so bloody what? Any undergraduate so feeble-minded that they can’t pass a bronze statue without having their “safe space” violated really does not deserve to be here. And besides, if we were to remove Rhodes’s statue on the premise that his life wasn’t blemish-free, where would we stop? As one of our alumni Dan Hannan has pointed out, Oriel’s other benefactors include two kings so awful – Edward II and Charles I – that their subjects had them killed. The college opposite – Christ Church – was built by a murderous, thieving bully who bumped off two of his wives. Thomas Jefferson kept slaves: does that invalidate the US Constitution? Winston Churchill had unenlightened views about Muslims and India: was he then the wrong man to lead Britain in the war?”
Actually, we’ll go further than that. Your Rhodes Must Fall campaign is not merely fatuous but ugly, vandalistic and dangerous. We agree with Oxford historian RW Johnson that what you are trying to do here is no different from what ISIS and the Al-Qaeda have been doing to artefacts in places like Mali and Syria. You are murdering history.
And who are you, anyway, to be lecturing Oxford University on how it should order its affairs? Your #rhodesmustfall campaign, we understand, originates in South Africa and was initiated by a black activist who told one of his lecturers “whites have to be killed”. One of you – Sizwe Mpofu-Walsh – is the privileged son of a rich politician and a member of a party whose slogan is “Kill the Boer; Kill the Farmer”; another of you, Ntokozo Qwabe, who is only in Oxford as a beneficiary of a Rhodes scholarship, has boasted about the need for “socially conscious black students” to “dominate white universities, and do so ruthlessly and decisively!”
Great. That’s just what Oxford University needs. Some cultural enrichment from the land of Winnie Mandela, burning tyre necklaces, an AIDS epidemic almost entirely the result of government indifference and ignorance, one of the world’s highest per capita murder rates, institutionalised corruption, tribal politics, anti-white racism and a collapsing economy. Please name which of the above items you think will enhance the lives of the 22,000 students studying here at Oxford.
And then please explain what it is that makes your attention grabbing campaign to remove a listed statue from an Oxford college more urgent, more deserving than the desire of probably at least 20,000 of those 22,000 students to enjoy their time here unencumbered by the irritation of spoilt, ungrateful little tossers on scholarships they clearly don’t merit using racial politics and cheap guilt-tripping to ruin the life and fabric of our beloved university.
Understand us and understand this clearly: you have everything to learn from us; we have nothing to learn from you.
Yours,
ORIEL COLLEGE OXFORD

South Afica Belong to the Whites Too!!!

This letter was written by a black person, Lethu Buthelezi:

White people need to stop apologising for being white, they also need to stop entertaining the racist comments. Being offended by them only fuels the fire of racism, rise above.

Black people need to start taking responsibility for their own progression in life instead of making "white" an accusation.

People of South Africa need to unite and stop being so complacent. We need all the support we can get to fix this mess Zuma has put us in and take our country back! This land is not the Zulu's, Khoisan or Zumas land, its the land of the people of South Africa!

If the ANC, EFF and DA just could have the same sentiments, then SA will be a better place for all!!!!

White People Never Stole Any Land!

Not so long ago Zuma tried to stir up anti-white hatred by accusing whites that they stole land from the blacks. Zuma and everyone know this is a bullshit story!
Here is the truth:
"The ANC and its government have created a narrative which portrays white farmers as thieves of land that rightfully belongs to the indigenous people of this country. Although these farmers benefited from the apartheid system, it’s disingenuous to attribute the 1913 Land Act to them; they were not yet born. On the other hand, the government’s bad public policy and corruption are responsible for escalating poverty in SA. It’s unfair to blame white farmers for the mismanagement of the land restitution; the blame should be attributed to the poor project management within the government. Most of the land that was attained by black farmers through the land restitution process is commercially redundant. The government failed to craft a Local Economic Development (LED) framework that will assist traditional communities to use the land commercially.
The Royal Bafokeng and Bakgatla-ba-Kgafela were able to formulate their own LED framework and governance structures. The upshot of this has been impressive economic development by these two traditional communities. My ‘thumb-suck’ estimations are that there are about 10 million beneficiaries of the land restitution policy who could maximise the acquired land commercially and become economically empowered. Interestingly, these people automatically acquired the mining rights when they received the land. It is very clear that the government has no plan for how to assist the people who have already acquired land.
If we are serious about fixing South Africa, we should create a public policy that would enable the ‘boer’ (farmer) to come back to farming and ‘maak ‘n plan’. Experienced farmers (white) and new (mostly black) farmers should work together. Black farmers will bring the land while their experienced counterparts bring their massive experience.
The ANC government and unions should start to appreciate the role of farmers in providing food security and creating jobs. Our public policy should be formulated in such a way that most experienced farmers can still own land because in the absence of land, banks won’t give them funding. Actually, all farmers should be given financial support and subsidies regardless of their race.
While the Asian countries and Europeans appreciate and empower their farmers, here in SA the ANC government treats them with contempt and suspicion; this should stop. Massive economic development in China and Asia were stimulated by a thriving agriculture sector. Growth in agriculture boosts productivity in manufacturing and services sectors – this leads to job creation."
Acknowledgement: Rabelani Dagada

Africa in a Nutshell!

Famine… Drought… Overpopulation… Deforestation… Conflict… Barbarism… Cruelty… Machetes… Child Soldiers… Massacres… Diamonds… Warlords…Tyranny… Corruption… Despair… Disease… Aids… Africa .
Africa remains the heart of darkness. Africa is hell.

The Ugly Face of Black Racism in South Africa

Today I, a very proud Afrikaans speaking person, who is just coincidentally white, am very angry. As I was planning to leave campus an enormous disturbance occurred. The EFF decided, to once again, protest. As always this is probably Apartheid's fault or Jan van Riebeecks's. Today's whole situation was about abolishing the Afrikaans language from an Afrikaans Universiteit van Pretoria. Today I was afraid and terrified in a place where we annually pay hundreds of thousands of rands to gain an education, to in the long run get away from the racisit crap like this. The english speaking people in the protest, who were all coincidentally and conveniently black, started fights, threw policemen with rubbish, threatened white people, who weren't even Afrikaans, to hurt them and come after them. They had sticks and every intent to become violent. The say that Afrikaans is disrupting them and it is influencing their abilities to study. When in fact there are English and Afrikaans lectures for most of the subjects.
Yes some of the subjects are taught bilingually, but just a newsflash. There are many Afrikaans speaking people who struggle with english and that influences them in a negative way.
Some important things I realized today...
1. Some people will find anything to protest about because they receive a lot of their education and money free from the government, so it does not mean anything to them if they miss out on their studies or if they have to return for another year.
2. Racism goes both ways, but not in South Africa. Here only the whites were taught how to be racist. If a white person looks at a black person, it is racist. But if black people wear shirts and walk around with posters that read " Fuck all whites" , "Kill all the whites" it is apparently just freedom of speech.
3. Don't get me wrong. Today I spoke to various black people who think this is all just absurd. I was pleasantly surprised and impressed at the way they are open minded enough to take Afrikaans and the white peoples' concerns into mind.
4. Some black people are just out to hate and hurt white people. This whole thing is not about Afrikaans and inequality, but we all know this about the hatred that has been inflicted on these blacks who were apparently previously disadvantaged by Apartheid, but the funny part of it, most of them were born right when Apartheid came to an end and I can't remember shit about when i was born, so I doubt that they can.
I am all for freedom of speech and speaking your mind, but if your sole intent is hatred, nothing good can ever come from it.
One always sees the black people rioting, but never the aftermath. Attached is an image of the white, Afrikaans students picking up all the rubbish that the black people took from the dustbins and threw it all around and kicked it like real and true animals.. Maybe some of us did evolve from apes and gorillas.. Theory still has to be proven.
In would love to finish my degree and get out of this country. Because being a girl, white AND Afrikaans is apparently a very bad combination to be in South Africa. As my friend and I walked home, we were completely terrified. And that is some fucked up shit to be that afraid of just being born a certain way.
I did this in English, because i would not want to disrespect or disadvantage anyone
REMEMBER ... Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat. She did not throw rubbish on the bus, break it, and the burned it down
That is all
Thank you
Name withheld to avoid victimization

Black ANC Racists Who Got Scott Free for Racial Slurs

From Dianne Kohler-Barnard to Chris Hart and Penny Sparrow, the rallying call has been for punitive action, namely remove them from their jobs. In addition the discovery that Sparrow is a DA member has prompted the ANC to lodge a complaint with the South African Human Rights Commission pleading the commission to investigate racism within the DA. But it is not just the ANC that felt vindicated, social media was set ablaze as many delighted to have caught the DA with their pants down. The apex of the outrage being the push to criminalise racism.



Below is a list of quotes from high-profile black South Africans whose racial slurs did not elicit the same mass moral outrage we’ve seen in the case of Sparrow, Hart and Justin van Vuuren. Not only was the outrage more muted when weighed against their public profiles and the trio’s relative obscurity but there was no move to beyond an apology and remove them from their posts. Secondly, most of the offenders are ANC members, yet there has been no call to investigate the ANC as a party. Ironically Lindiwe Sisulu, who has called for the Estate Agency Affairs Board to report to her on action that can be taken against Sparrow, is herself a multiple offender when it comes to offensive and racial slurs. This is not a competition premised on who can be more racist, the hope is that the conversation should move away from trying to pathologise one race and painting another as victims. It is not my view that the comments below are all racist, only that they most certainly would have been deemed as such had they come from the mouths of white South Africans.



Lindiwe Sisulu



What better way to showcase the illegitimacy of the recent furore over Chris Hart’s tweet than to begin with Sisulu’s own tweet about entitlement. In July 2014 speaking about plans to eradicate the 2.3 million unit housing backlog she said,
“What makes an 18-year-old think the state owes them a house? It’s a culture of entitlement … we can’t continue with a dependency culture.”



In Parliament in June of the same year she accused Mmusi Maimane of being a “hired native”. The comment was eventually ruled by parliament chairperson Thandi Modise as unparliamentary. It is near improbable that a white MP could get away with calling a black member of parliament a hired native.



In November 2012 in a heated discussion with David Maynier in the National Assembly over chartered jet flights used by the minister, Sisulu retorted
“Keep your flea-infested body at peace and sit down.”



Julius Malema



A look at a list of racially provocative slurs would be incomplete without Malema. The leader of the EFF has become more demure in his racial taunts in an attempt to fashion the EFF as a party welcoming to white South Africans. Such is the amnesia that Floyd Shivambu has tweeted “unfortunately the racist statements of #PennySparrow define many white people and DA supporters in SA & the indecisive Gov is complicit”. Shivambu was seated right next to Malema in April 2010 when Malema lashed out at BBC correspondent Jonah Fisher,
“This is a building of a revolutionary party, and you know nothing about the revolution … so here you behave or else you jump … chief can you get security to remove this thing here … and you don’t come here with that tendency, don’t come here with that white tendency, not here … you are a small boy, you cannot do anything.” He concludes this rant by calling him a “bastard” and a “bloody agent”.



Richard Schweid, an author who in his book The Cockroach Papers: A Compendium of History and Lore gives a thorough examination of cockroaches said “if you want to say something nasty about someone, call him a cockroach: that lowest of the low, vilest of the vile, most easily eliminated without a pang of remorse, the cheapest of all lives”. In October 2010 addressing a crowd in Stellenbosch Malema called Helen Zille a cockroach.


“If Zille had her way, she would declare the Western Cape an independent republic. You have put a cockroach in Cabinet and we need to remove that cockroach by voting the ANC into power.”



Penny Sparrow took a feather from Malema’s cap it would seem, again deriding Zille he said in April 2012,
“Have you ever seen an ugly woman in a blue dress dancing like a monkey because she is looking for votes?”



But Malema’s ire is not reserved only for his white political opponents, in May 2011 speaking of his refusal to debate Lindiwe Mazibuko he said,
“She is a tea girl of the madame, and her role must remain there in the kitchen for making the tea for the madame. Because that’s what she chose for herself. So I am not going to be debating with servants for the madame.”



Baleka Mbete



Malema is not the only one fond of calling his opponents cockroaches. The “joke” was turned on him in February last year when the speaker of the National Assembly speaking at the Mmabatho Civic Centre in Mafikeng said,
“We all need to [work] … because if we don’t we will continue to have the cockroaches like the Malemas … roaming all over the place.”



Isaac Mahlangu



Speaking in Nelspruit in 2009, the Mpumalanga ANC Youth League secretary spoke of those who had defected to the Congress of the People (Cope) saying,
“Everyone knows that Cope was formed by insects that are hell-bent on holding onto power”, and would be “sprayed with Doom until it perishes”.



Before calling them insects he had also said “not one of those mad dogs who defected from the ANC and formed the Assembly of Polokwane Losers should get anything”.



Anele Mda



September 2009 Congress of the People youth leader Anele Mda and member of Parliament calls the Cope deputy secretary general Deidre Carter a “stupid, white token bitch”.



At the time Charlotte Lobe, Cope general secretary, made a statement that it was a once-off incident and speaking of the two-month suspension of Mda said, “this is not punishment, it is rehabilitation”. In 2011 Mda was welcomed back to the ANC with open arms at an announcement where Jacob Zuma was present.



Jimmy Manyi



Jimmy Manyi, the then director general at the department labour, appeared on kykNet in March 2010. He spoke of coloured people in the Western Cape saying,
“This over-concentration of coloured people in the Western Cape is not working for them …they are in over-supply where they are.”



Khaya Dlanga



This illustration here is added last, as an example of how black South Africans even outside of the political space can make racially dubious remarks in the name of humour. Not incidentally I have no objections to making fun of our racial insecurities, the trouble is that a white person would not get away with making the comments Dlanga does in this November 2008 YouTube video titled “I want to marry a white woman”.



“Black women do not like it one bit when brothers are into white women … I have noticed, especially the last few years that when a black man marry white woman they seem to create this super child. So I want to have my own little tribe of super children … this is my evidence; look at Barack Obama his father is a black man, his mother is a white woman.”



Based on the reactions to this week’s accused trio, if the proposed criminalisation of race were in place when the above comments were made many prominent black South Africans would have been charged. This is not including the many unknown black South Africans like
Velaphi Khumalo, whose social media profiles are yet to be scanned. If we will not abandon the obsession with our racial identities, then at the very least perhaps we can lay bare the hypocrisy and dishonesty of treating black South Africans as the victims.



We’re all suffering from living in a country absolutely mad about race. Now that we’re all victims perhaps we can stop the finger wagging and conjuring of absurd laws and set our sights back on more productive areas of outrage and policy innovation such as the economy (myself included).




Acknowledgement:
Gwen Ngwenya
www.thoughtleader.co.za

The Ugly Face of Black Entitlement, Black Savagery and Anti-White Hatred and Discrimination

17 February the black rampage at the University of Cape Town continued. It was a full on chimpout by the university’s beloved Noble Savages they nursed all these years.
Historical art and pictures of white people were burned. Slogans screaming “Fuck white people” and “Fuck black exclusion” were spray painted all over campus. A Jammie-shuttle bus providing free transport for students was burned out along with cars. The Vice Chancelor, Max Price’s, office was fire bombed.
Amongst the eight people arrested was the “underprivileged” son of millionaire Brian Molefe, CEO of Eskom.
Brain Molefe’s salary and full remunerations are R15million a year.
Itumeleng Molefe is a “born free” who never suffered under Apartheid. He went to the best schools, drives fancy cars, wears only brand name clothes and has never in his life experienced poverty. He stays in a private flat, What is he protesting about?
The ironic thing here is that the perpetrators are all privileged blacks, when in fact it should have been done by underprivileged whites.
“Fuck black exclusion”???
I had to laugh when I saw that. UCT has an extreme racist policy of WHITE EXCLUSION. If anything whites should be on the rampage seeing that they are fully in their right to protest unjust policies and laws that discriminate against them.
For example; to study medicine at the University of Cape Town (UCT), white and Indian students require at least a 78% average on their National Senior Certificate, a Chinese student 73%, a coloured student 64%...whereas black students only requires 59%.
Bar still raised for white students
But UCT is not the only university. In the four years from 2005 to 2009, all four universities in the Western Cape (UCT, UWC, CPUT and US) radically increased the percentage of black students accepted and decreased the percentage of white and coloured students admitted.
In certain professional programmes, including the MBChB degree, preference was given to coloured, African and Indian students. White students were then given the remaining available spots.
Not only that. Under the Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) laws, Companies dealing with UCT are scored based on the quota of black ownership, senior managers, training, as well as suppliers. These scores then translate into their ability to compete for tenders.
Further, under the Affirmative Action (AA) laws, UCT operates a quota system policy for hiring and promotion of lecturers and admin staff. Positions will be left unfilled if the appropriate demographic candidate cannot be recruited, even if another qualified person is available.
So I am sorry if I sound a bit indifferent to the crisis at UCT. It is self created. They made their bed; They must lie on it.
They made the biggest mistake any authority can make when faced with protests: They caved in to #RhodesMustFall and therefore created expectations.
P.W. Botha made the same mistake when he created the Tri-cameral parliament by including Coloureds and Indians. What did it bring him? Protests in the townships, including coloured townships, INCREASED, not decreased.
When these #RhodesMustFall idiots tried the same at Oxford in England where people can study with a Rhodes scholarship for two years, the university authorities basically told them to “Piss Off!” and amazingly they did.
When you study revolutions everywhere, French, Russian, South African, Egyptian, etc...you will see that the moment the guys in authority make concessions, want to negotiate and give in to demands, they have lost. They raise expectations and the protests increase until everything is burned to the ground and anarchy reigns. Same with UCT.
UCT should never have started with any racist policies let alone cave in to black racists, but yes...liberals always know better. If UCT burns to the ground...check the worry in my eye.
By Mike Smith

The Sequel: Penny Sparrow is not a Racist

Author's note: Read the first post on the Penny Sparrow saga also on this blog.
The Americans are experts on the "conspiracy theory" but South Africa is not far behind them. They like to find conspiracies against the blacks behind each and every stone and then want to nurture it and rename it to "white racism."
But it takes two to tango so here is my conspiracy theory regarding the Penny Sparrow Racism Circus.
2016 is earmarked for Municipal Elections and many people believed it would be scheduled for the 1st quarter of 2016 but then Zuma Must Fall made the balls-up with Nene and Van Rooyen so it will now be later.
However, the ANC and DA both decided to play the race card as an election gimmick and here entered Penny.
Penny is a true supporter of the DA due to its roots with the liberal whites of yesteryears and the DA asked her to wrote something racist so that they can make a racial issue/circus of it.
And there came her FB post comparing the innocent, disciplined and behaving blacks who visited the South Coasts beaches over the festive seaon with monkeys!
And the DA was ready to make the mother of all racist issues to gain the confidence of the black voters and they liked it.
And Penny? She is devoted to the DA and she sacificed her good name for a good cause!
PS: Remember this is a conspiracy theory based on my opinion of what really happened: Nigel Olifaunt - Guest Writer

Penny Sparrow is not a Racist Thanks to ANCYL

When Penny Sparrow compared blacks with monkeys in January this year  the ANC and DA as well as the liberal media jumped on their high horses on a chase to be the first to to procecute her as a racist, found her guilty and hanged her in public.
The EFF and ANCYL held marches and demonstrations till Kingdom Come to show how bad Penny and all whites are.
But hold your horses all the idiots went for the over-kill of Penny. She is no racist! And everyone who went on the Gestapo-hunt of Penny should apologise in public: SHE IS NO RACIST!!!!
During the weekend of 6/7 February the big racist Collen Maine, President of the ANCYL compared the the followers of the EFF with monkeys during a rally in Soshanguve:
"The country will be defended. We cannot allow Julius Malema and his monkeys to run our country amok and turn this country into a banana republic," Maine reportedly said, according to the SABC.
But nobody climbed on their high horses to condemn Maine as racist.
The pathetic ANC said no need for steps. It was not racist. It was just offensive.
That is why I say Penny is no more a racist than Maine and the country owes her an apolgy and especially from Zuma and Maimane and the liberal media.
PENNY SPARROW, YOU ARE NOT A RACIST!!!
GO, YOU GOOD GIRL GO!!!!

Black Racism in South Africa

AFTER 20 years of so-called “democracy“-South Africa turned out to be the most racist stronghold  in the world for all blacks that have a natural deep rooted hatred against whites- it seems.
As we have seen- the South African local news was not dominated– but factually OBLITERATED by articles of “white racism” this past month-or so. Since the communist ANC dregs of society took “control” of the country after De Klerk and his NP stray dogs were handsomely paid by the Jewish Oppenheimer/Kissinger clans- the war against “Boers” (read whites)–  were launched . Mandela, Mbeki, the international world – and all the world governments heard and saw this- yet choose to keep a “diplomatic” silence and “ look the other way.”
Whites across the European and American world that COULD have made a difference-or at least offer some assistance to whites in South Africa- were also so marinated in the “Free Mandela” and “Apartheid” brain-washed misconceptious culture propagated by the Zionist media– they also decided that the “Boers” can now sort out their own dilemma and sunk back into their own little worlds of false ” democracy.”
The next to take up the war against whites in South Africa- was the local NASPERS media skunk works- and whites were viciously attacked in the media as “racists, far right wingers “and “ white supremacists.” Next to follow was a barrage of anti-white “laws” that were cleverly disguised under the racist constitution ( which was written by Jews)– to start eliminating whites from the job market, social life, historical events- and on tertiary level. Still the hippocratic world kept their silence.
For twenty years this facade went on- with one after the other racist and incriminating law flung against whites- a total of 119 of them. As-if that was not enough- did a terrible genocide against whites start to manifest with heathens such as Peter Mokaba, Julius Malema and Jacob Zuma openly advocating the killing of whites- and organized black gangs started to attack whites on farms and in the cities to such an extent that World Genocide Watch already moved the white genocide in South Africa to a level 6 out of a possible 8. Yet still the hippocratic world kept their silence- thus giving their approval to the extermination program of whites orchestrated and running in South Africa- even that “more than holy” United Nations , human rights movements, humanitarian aid organizations- and yea- the so-called “politically correct”church started to back-paddle- embracing  Zionist “diversity.”
The momentum to discriminate against whites started to escalate and direct attacks against all that is white were now pinned down in the form of “laws”– and while the racist anti-white regimes of both Mbeki and Zuma now was hell-bent to wipe whites totally out of the South African society, disarm them and hunt them down and throw them in jail on false charges- the vultures behind their NASPERS computers did more than their bit to advocate naked hatred and racism against whites in their tabloids. On a daily basis you read about the white “supremacist” here- the white “racist” there- the “black face” here- the ” racist ” social site there , “racist” anthem, “racist flag”, “racist” gathering and so on.
For years they keep on pummeling society with the “racist” whites. The irony is that NASPERS are controlled by liberal WHITES.Even in their crime articles they used white models to represent the “villains.”Mean-while 90 % of all ground-level crimes in South Africa are committed by blacks. NOW I am not saying ALL blacks are criminals- but ironically most criminals happen to be  black! It seems the ANC also imposed their “demography” representation in the criminal world. This seem to be ONE area the ANC and their racist laws does not want to “advertise” the true reflection of how well their”demography” shit are represented! Yet the ANC hoodlums and their media want to blame WHITES and Van Riebeeck for “racism” and all the troubles we now face?
As the momentum took shape- direct attacks on whites against their history, their schools, their language, their heritage, their universities and their historical statues gathered speed. We still freshly remember the “#Rhodesmustfall” campaign. Black racism now were fueled by the vindictive ANC communist regime under Jacob Zuma–  and the NASPERS media wretches. This was no more evident than the huge “outcry” against Steve Hoffmeyer and the “Die Stem” fiasco- as well as the direct onslaught against Sunette Bridges who tried to stand up for whites. Dubious corporate thugs  also took part in this sick game ( Like a certain bank that try to brain-wash clients with their  un-Steve campaign) – and quickly notified the world they are “distancing” themselves from the likes of Hoffmeyer and Bridges- and cancelled sponsorships.
This created the perfect scenario to start a final direct  assault against whites to demonize them in the eyes of the world- and the local black population- and in January 2016 that assault was launched by the Jews behind the ANC and DA with the “Penny Sparrow” false flag operation. Whites now were targeted to receive the full brunt of anti-white black racism propaganda. “Penny Sparrow” was a figment of the DA Jew imagination– and in co-operation with the ANC  and their media- this false flag operation was launched to try to decimate and belittle the last credible status whites in South Africa might have.
For weeks on end the NASPERS and Gupta controlled New Age media scoundrels did their very best to start a massacre of whites by radical black groups through the “Penny Sparrow” incident- instigating blacks to start at least “something.” BUT bar the socialites on black sites that uttered naked racist slanders against whites- nothing more came from it. BUT in the meantime whites were only exploited by the ANC and their media  as scapegoats to divert the attention of the populace away from Zuma – who was busy clinching the biggest scam of his career- the Russian nuclear deal. Slowly “Penny Sparrow” faded from the memory- bar – as expected- a few ANC dregs promising another “law-or-two” against white “racism” again. BUT that was still not the end. Across the spectrum the evil media hyped blacks to a frenzy- splashing the tiniest morsel of “assumed” racism by whites on their front pages.
After the Penny Sparrow debacle the next so-called “Bombshell” fell when two innocent white girls painted their faces PURPLE– and IMMEDIATELY our old reliable dregs-NASPERS– were at the forefront to advertise this “unacceptable” BLACK FACE “racism” to the world.
 There we go again. Every chancellor, deacon, tutor and professor ran for their briefcases and laptops to “distance” themselves again from this “preposterous” racism on the Stellenbosch campus before their poor institution are also labelled “racist” by the media. On the end it turned out to be one huge bullshit propaganda stunt as the girls did not even paint their faces black- but PURPLE. BUT the evil media has done their damage- and the poor girls  were expelled for this innocent stunt- and NO formal apology by ANY of those same “administrators” of the university was given to those two girls. We do not even want to talk about an apology by the media criminals- they NEVER give an apology. Satan simply does not back-track.
 Discrimination against whites in South Africa now are busy reaching it’s peak.
Acknowledgement: WHITE NATION