Are You A Racist If You Like The Old South African Flag?

It is interesting that the main and only response of the government, the DA and the EFF to the most successful event  #BlackMonday  on 30 October 2017 was that whites are racists for bearing the old South African flag during the event.

Are you indeed a racist if you like the old South African flag (the flag before 1994)? NO!

This is based on only 2 points:

1.       The old flag is part and parcel of the white cultural heritage and if the government, DA and EFF as well as white libtards are of the opinion that this flag is symbolic to the country’s oppressive past and is therefore a thorn in the flesh of non-white citizens of the country then they must get rid of everything reminding the poor stressed people of the past – the mere fact that a non-white person sees a white person, will that remind them of our oppressive past? Is this the reason that Zuma and Malema as well as other non-white politician loves to sing “Kill The Boer . . .”. Is this the reason why white farmers are slaughtered?

2.       In the preparation for the 1994 elections the ANC promised that everyone will be equal and that whites will be part and parcel of this new democracy. After 23 years into the democANC, racy it is quite clear that actually we are not  welcome – singing of “Kill the Boer . . ., Zuma openly entice people to take back the land whites stole, persecuting whites who are guilty of racial slurs or  cases of hate speech but dragging feet for non-white transgressors, etc.

Therefore, it is my humble opinion that whites who still bear the old flag are not racists and as and when government and other black parties stop looking for white racists behind every bush, stop blaming Apartheid or whites for everything that goes wrong after 23 years of rule, stop targeting the cultural heritage of whites and see whites as equal partners (citizens) of this country whites will indeed love to bear the new symbols of the New South Africa.

PS: Here is a list of relating articles to this problem. Read it:

http://freelancer-daniel.blogspot.co.za/2017/07/the-unbearable-whiteness-of-being.html

http://freelancer-daniel.blogspot.co.za/2017/06/dealing-with-white-and-black-racism-in.html

http://freelancer-daniel.blogspot.co.za/2017/05/just-another-anti-white-race-card-troll.html

http://freelancer-daniel.blogspot.co.za/2016/03/swart-rassisme-vs-wit-rassisme.html

http://freelancer-daniel.blogspot.co.za/2017/05/racist-town-or-racist-premier.html

Visionary Statesman or Terrorist?

A picture is worth a thousand words.  Was this man a visionary statesman or just a terrorist?

I think the latter is what he was. Before you answer the question for yourself, read this news item first: Amnesty for Zuma?

If he was a visionary statesman, would this the be the status of the leader of South Africa? No!

If he was a visionary statesman he would ensure that his ANC leaders would be equipped to continue the legacy he himself established since 1994 until he departed from the public arena.

It is scandalous that the President of the country is a criminal and that the ANC has the audacity to think in the direction of getting him amnesty for all the charges against him!!!!

Woman24 and the Spur Debacle!

Response to Lili Radloff’s What the Spur boycott has taught women(but black woman especially).

At last Spur had realized that they were wrong about the so-called racial incident where they took their frustrations out on a white male and banned him from Spur because he stood up when his little child was the victim of   hate/racial attack on her in a Spur's playground.

Now, the libtards are up in arms - 'how the hell can Spur backtrack and apologise to their white customers'?

When I saw the caption of Lili Radloff's post on Women24 'What the Spur boycott has taught women (but black women especially)' my blood pressure hit the high notes and for my own good health I decided not to read the post. But then I decided to hell with it, whites should stop turning the other cheek and with a handful high blood pressure tablets, I read it. You can read it here!

Then read the article giving perspective that there was never a Spur boycott by whites and decide for yourself which one is the fake news one! Die Kwansuise Spur Boikot!

White males are blamed for everything bad in SA but I do not worry because as long as they envy you, they will write/talk about you.

Everyone wanted to crucify the white dad and everyone had sympathy with the black mother but nobody said a word about the black boy giving the white girl a 'vagina klap' which started the 'racial storm in a teacup'. Is this how boys grow up? Is this how we bring our children up? Lifting your hand for a girl and later for a woman?? Remember Judge Mabel Jansen? Now I ask: Is this what the Spur Incident has taught women and children?

And at the end of the day people still think whites boycotted Spur for what happened? Read this again!

But the libtards will still play the anti-white male race card until Jesus comes like Zuma said!

Just Another Anti-White Race Card Troll

Just when I thought it is safe to surf News24.com another anti-white race card troll pitched up, this time Faatimah Hendricks.

Yes, poor little Faatimah is so upset with white racists that she had to write yet another opinion about white racists. READIT HERE!

If you dissect it, it is just another "much said about nothing" complaint about whites.

Those who follow my blog will know I had written a few post about this sickness of playing the race card.

But why do people like to play this anti-white race card. To understand why, read the opinion of Mondi Zondo "WhyPresident Zuma's race card offends me".

I just want to quote the following paragraph from it:
"It is for this reason that I was shocked and angered when I heard President Zuma remark that last week’s protests were fuelled by racism. I believe many of us recognise that this is nothing but a distraction and Zuma hopes that playing the race card will rally black people around him."

Give him a Bell's because this is exactly the problem with anti-white race card trolls - they want to distract their own inability to contribute any good to this country because they envy White Superiority, White Capital, White Privilege, any anything good about whites.

The problem is that people like Zuma and Faatimah bitch about the so-called white racists (please note, I do not deny there are white racists, but there are also black, colored and Indian racists) because they have inferior complexes who for more than 23 years of “democracy” have done nothing to make South Africa a better place for all and with their anti-white race cards try to distract their inferiority.

Therefore, all anti-white race card trolls, stop bitching about whites and work/earn your own privilege, superiority and capital.  

Faatimah, rather reach out to the white population so that we all can work together to make South Africa a better place for ALL!!!! 

Do we still have a democracy in South Africa?

Can we, after the ruling yesterday by the CC re The Hon. Zuma and the Inkhandla-gate, say that we have a democracy in South Africa?
Probably not at grassroots level, but officially our democracy is alive and well and living in the court rooms and the office of the PP.
Because there is so little honesty in politics today, what you hear (promises) is more often than not, NOT what you GET.
The PAC promised free houses for all and would probably confiscate it from the "haves" of those days - only to give it to the elect few of their inner circle.
The ANC promised freedom for all - an expensive and all encompassing commodity. After 22 years of "true" democracy, this commodity is even scarcer that ever.
80% of the school system is dysfunctional. It is being controlled by trade unions whose only aim is control in the widest sense of the word. Despite their denial, there is probably a great element of the in the report that laid the scandal of the selling of teacher posts (vacancies) bare.
The only "salvation" are the prior Category-C schools, which, although mostly English (Black) today, are striving to keep up some form of standard. "Disciple" is, unfortunately, a foreign word.
Wake up, Zuma-dom, and realize that this country is going to shreds!
Everything has its price today, except quality - That is price less, so priceless that it appears to be unobtainable!
Viva South Africa, Viva! Viva Democracy, Viva!
South Africa, the World (and Standard & Poor) will be watching the developments in the next few days with interest.
My best wishes
(1) to Mr. Pravin Gordham and the Treasury who must produce the Inkhandla figures for Mr. Zuma,
(2) also to Mr. Zuma who must now fire his ministers (Police, Public Works) who did his dirty work, thinking that there will be some form of (p)raise for them in the process - more gravy, perhaps? and
(3) to the Executive of the ANC, who must fire the Hon. Mr. Zuma.
Acknowledgement: Wesley Lamprecht

Zuma and His Racards! Boring Stuff!

Zuma continuous to use the race cards and blaming whites. This is the the only ammunition at their disposal. ENOUGH of this! This should stop.
Currently it is all about me and my racist corner and me and my cronies. We as a nation have lost the plot. We lie, we cheat, we steal, we rape, we torture, we abuse, we murder, etc. with no end in sight. Not to mention the utter failing of our legal and economic platforms. Crime is out of control because there are no harsh enough penalties as deterrents. Notwithstanding failure in the apprehending of criminals and the successful prosecution thereof.
This Colonized Apartheid Rhetorics (CARS) combined with capitalist communist mafia cronies must stop.
What do we mean by Colonized Apartheid Rhetoric’s (CARS)?
It is like somebody talking about so-called evils of a car that they never had, experienced, driven of even have seen. Yet they claim to be the know it all master of none like the EFF. Even the EFF claim that his people had it better under Apartheid.
This nonsense of CARS must be stopped at all cost as to prevent the total destruction of our democracy. Colonized Apartheid Rhetoric which was burdened on a nation by an corrupt English Anglo Empire which was and are currently used by external forces to manipulate this country.
Currently the constitution is undermined and under threat by capitalist communist mafia cronies like i.e. Zuma and the Guptas and many more factors such as Colonized Apartheid Rhetoric’s. This country currently are ruled by the Guptas which is tantamount to a state grab or que de ta. This is not the 1st time. Who can forget the corrupt relationship between Zuma and Shabier Shake? Also take into account that even political entities such as the SA Communist who leaches on to ANC and whom have never stood alone in election. They know that they would never stand a chance to win an election on their own. Yet they occupy every important department of the corrupt government. Their doctrines are mirrored through policies adopted and steamrolled through parliament with no affect or succeeded resistance from opposition due to their strength in numbers. We saw this twice when there was failed attempt to get rid of Zuma with a vote of no confidence.
The ANC is playing very fatal dangerous game. If Zuma is not recalled then it opens the door to a dangerous Pandora box which could pave the way for civil unrest like you have not seen in your life time in this country. Even maybe out right civil war. Our constitution is losing its value and even authority day by day because these matters are conveniently ignored on purpose.
Franscois Malan

Zuma and his Race Frenzy

Let's have a parody on race. Not the race of life, but the issue of race, you know: I'm a black man in terms of racial classification.
It raises many questions when you think about it.
When I look at myself in the mirror, I wonder why I'm called 'black'. I'm not really black. I'm more brown, of sorts, albeit a deep dark brown. But I cannot call myself brown, or even dark brown, as there are people who are known as brown people, i.e. the Coloured people. Now if they are known as brown or Coloured, why am I known as black?
It's rather confusing. I also have a colour, which means I'm also coloured, strictly spoken, although my colour is a bit darker than their colour, although I'm also brown, rather than black.
To make it more confusing I can assure you, is that you actually get Coloured or brown people who are darker brown than I am, yet they are not black, but coloured.
You see? Where are we going with this?
The brown or Coloured people speak mainly Afrikaans, not Zulu, like me. Afrikaans is the Boer language, spoken by most whites in SA.
In America you have black Americans. Mr Obama ia a black American. But he is actually of mixed race, like our Colured people, as his mother was white. His father was black like we in Africa. Now he is called an 'African American', as if he is like us black Africans. But he is not. He is racially like our Coloured (brown) people. He also does not speak a black African language, just as is the case with our Coloured people. Now why should he be a black American if he is actually a Coloured? Eish.
Mr Zuma our President (aptly called Zoombie by my best friend Sommie Somerset Morkel), is of lighter brown colour, but he is black because he is a Zulu like I am. But he is lighter brown than many of the Coloured people in SA. Yet he is black.
It becomes more confusing when it gets to the white people. They are not really white. They have a peculiar colour which is really hard to describe, but it's not white, as white is the colour of snow, which they are by far not. They are something between pink, orange, red or such, also in different hues. In the black community we have albinos, who are whiter than any whites, i assure you. Yet they are black. Confusing? For sure.
Take the Chinese. Are they yellow? And those in India. What colour are they really? Why are they not called according to colour? Why is it that only when it gets to black that people who are actually brown are called black? But in SA people who are mixed race are called brown, contrary to America where they are called black?
In America they have something like Black History Month. But to me black has a negative connotation such as in bad. A black month to me would seem to link with a dark time, which is not good, as it sounds like a time of disaster, a negative period of time. Well, maybe it is, as black history in both America and SA reflect more darkness than light.
People of colour are called dark skinned, and white people are called light skinned. But dark is negative (pun intended), while light is positive. Eish.
It's actually a bit ridicilous, the way man has structured his view of race. Where are we going with this?
Some people nowadays get very upset on the issue of race. The famous world champion rugby team of New Zealand whom I greatly respect, are called the All Blacks. But the team is mostly populated by whites. The blacks in the team are more brown than black. That is not right, I would consider. When will someone protest that?
In SA it is the stated policy of the ANC government to eradicate racism. We know they lie when we look at the facts, for how can they do that if they promote blackness but ignore brownness and Indianness and discriminate against whiteness? Is this a matter of darkness trying to overcome light? It sure seems like it.

Die ANC, DA en EFF se Gekerm en Gekla oor Rassisme!!!!

Daagliks brand "die volk" skole, universiteite, klinieke, winkels en dies meer af, bestuur paaie, damme, die Landbou en enige kommoditeit denkbaar in hulle peetjie, vermoor hulle blanke boere, huts hulle die massa aan om te roof, kaap, verkrag, martel en vir dood agter te laat.
Maar vandag marsjeer "die volk" teen die euwel der euwels: rassisme. Om sodoende stemme te werf vir die komende verkiesings, die ANC kaders in hulle poste te hou en om die aandag op die "rassistiese", wetsgehoorsame, belastingbetalende blankes te vestig. Sodoende verskuif die fokus weg van die ANC/EFF se georkestreerde agenda van vernietiging, verdien hulle punte op hulle eindelose pad na "freedom".

What South Africans Think Of Zuma

It is saddening when to watch ANC members in parliament selling their souls protecting the very same man who has destroyed this country. Jacob Zuma was never fit for presidency from the day he came from his mother's womb he is an earthquake what do earthquakes do?? Look around you he has divided the country racially and economically, socially, pschologically, morally he is a curse in this country everything he touches turns into a Tsunami
Tantaswa Ntswam
#SatANcMustFall

Zuma and the Achievements of the ANC since 1994

In a news report Zuma said today that they (ANC) achieved many things since 1994. READ HERE
It is significant that Zuma did not mention one achievement?
No wonder, because there is not one POSITIVE achievement!
What the ANC indeed achieved on the negative side are inter alia the following:
1. A president (yes Zuma) who was accused of rape and corruption and although he was acquitted, still continued  in his post in spite of the  cloud of doubt still hanging over him
2 A president (yes Zuma) who fired one of the most competent and dedicated Ministers of Finance without reason and appointed one of the most incompetent persons as Minister and when the heat was on, fired him and reappointed an ex-Minister with Nene still in the cold
3 A president (yes Zuma) who allowed millions of tax money to be spent on his homestead without batting an eye and allowed senior ministers to lie in public that it was not for his own gain
4 A president (yes Zuma) in public singing and dancing to "Kill the Farmer" while white farmers are murdered daily by black terrorists
5 A president (yes Zuma) on Reconciliation Day after 21 years that ANC took over said that there is no reconciliation because whites are racists
6 The health services of the country were gradually ran into the shit farm
7 The Post Office was gradually ran into the shit farm
8 ESKOM was gradually ran into the shit farm
9 Basis education was gradually ran into the shit farm
10 The SAA was gradually ran into the shit farm
11 Service delivery on Local Government level was ran into the shit farm
12 Mine workers were mowed down by the Police without the ANC caring a damn
13 The country is burning as a result of marches, demonstrations and hooliganism and thugery but ANC don't care a damn
14 The country has been gradually racialised by the ANC and racial tension is on the brink of erruption but ANC don't care
15 The Parliament and universities have been turned into war zones
Do I need say more but that the ANC has ran this country into the shit farm since 1994.
Therefore Zuma, there were no achievements since 1994!!!

Who or What is Behind the Student Revolution/Revolt/Unrest?

Someone asked the question who or what is behind the student revolution: the ANC, EFF, Media, etc.
My opinion is that the ANC have a pact with the EFF to use the universities as revolutionary war zones for the revolution that never happened just before or immediately after 1994.
Why do I say this?
Remember it was never Mandela's or the ANC's intention to have a smooth transition to a democracy where everyone could live in harmony with each other. That is why Mandela was so stubborn to denounce the armed struggled because they wanted a revolution where it would have been "Adieu South Africa" for the whites. But the manner in which De Klerk dealt with the matter and the way in which the West warmed to it, made the arch-terrorist to think twice.
So Mandela and his cronies decided to "give in" for the show, knowing that they would live another day to fight the revolution.
Everything went according to plan for the revolution but Mandela was too stubborn to die and Mad Max Zuma became president by means of the now well-known palace revolution.
So, while the ANC brain trust was planning for the delayed revolution and adieu South Africa party for the whites, Zuma lost it all and slowly but surely and then bloody fast, started to bugger up this country. Remember the movie of the 70's "Start the Revolution Without Me?". Zuma was too busy looting that he could not start with it. Then Gwede Mantashe and his cronies decided the revolution should come from outside the ANC to save face. They made a pact with Malema that they would stage a fallout and he would leave and start the EFF, which was just the modernised version of the struggle's MK.
Therefore, the student revolution is the brainchild of the ANC but run by the EFF or modern MK.
Think for yourself, the ANC haven't bat an eye or lifted a finger regarding the spade of student unrests!
And back at the ranch, Zuma enjoys his looting spree while Mantashe and his merry men are planning and executing the adieu South Africa party.
Note: This is entirely based on my own opinion of what is going on in South Africa.

White People Never Stole Any Land!

Not so long ago Zuma tried to stir up anti-white hatred by accusing whites that they stole land from the blacks. Zuma and everyone know this is a bullshit story!
Here is the truth:
"The ANC and its government have created a narrative which portrays white farmers as thieves of land that rightfully belongs to the indigenous people of this country. Although these farmers benefited from the apartheid system, it’s disingenuous to attribute the 1913 Land Act to them; they were not yet born. On the other hand, the government’s bad public policy and corruption are responsible for escalating poverty in SA. It’s unfair to blame white farmers for the mismanagement of the land restitution; the blame should be attributed to the poor project management within the government. Most of the land that was attained by black farmers through the land restitution process is commercially redundant. The government failed to craft a Local Economic Development (LED) framework that will assist traditional communities to use the land commercially.
The Royal Bafokeng and Bakgatla-ba-Kgafela were able to formulate their own LED framework and governance structures. The upshot of this has been impressive economic development by these two traditional communities. My ‘thumb-suck’ estimations are that there are about 10 million beneficiaries of the land restitution policy who could maximise the acquired land commercially and become economically empowered. Interestingly, these people automatically acquired the mining rights when they received the land. It is very clear that the government has no plan for how to assist the people who have already acquired land.
If we are serious about fixing South Africa, we should create a public policy that would enable the ‘boer’ (farmer) to come back to farming and ‘maak ‘n plan’. Experienced farmers (white) and new (mostly black) farmers should work together. Black farmers will bring the land while their experienced counterparts bring their massive experience.
The ANC government and unions should start to appreciate the role of farmers in providing food security and creating jobs. Our public policy should be formulated in such a way that most experienced farmers can still own land because in the absence of land, banks won’t give them funding. Actually, all farmers should be given financial support and subsidies regardless of their race.
While the Asian countries and Europeans appreciate and empower their farmers, here in SA the ANC government treats them with contempt and suspicion; this should stop. Massive economic development in China and Asia were stimulated by a thriving agriculture sector. Growth in agriculture boosts productivity in manufacturing and services sectors – this leads to job creation."
Acknowledgement: Rabelani Dagada

Democratic Alliance (DA): Quo Vadis?

Everyone (except the ANC) was over the moon when Mmusi Maimane was elected in May 2015 as Federal Leader of the Democratic Alliance. It was especially the black constituents and the white liberal die-hards of the party that thought this was the Moses that was destined to lead South Africa out of the political desert  dear old Zuma and his ANC created.

But just like the ANC, the new leader (black for the first time) and his black liberals were not very happy with the whites in the party – their vision was to be a black party just like the ANC.

And then it was when the bells tolled for the demise of the DA. Why? Because the DA’s roots go back to the United Party and De Villiers Graaff, through to Helen Suzman, Colin Eglin, Tony Leon and Helen Zille – all white liberals! So, Maimane it seems was not happy with the white burden his party has to carry and in the process alienating the black supporters.

And then his lucky day arrived with Dianne Kholer Barnard and the joke that she was a racist for sharing a FB post that it was better with PW Botha in charge of the country. And like a true Don Quixote on his donkey started to fight the evil white racists – Penny Sparrow, Chris Hart and all the 4 million odd whites.

But, that was his party’s death knell!  What he forgot is that the DA and its predecessors were the traditional home of the liberal whites who were against Apartheid. And now with his ‘war against white racism’ is going to cost him the white conservative and liberal vote The author of this article do not support white racism but what about black racism? Here Maimane is mum on black racism because he cannot afford to alienate black majority voters.  There are many examples on the social media of incidents of black racism but Maimane turned/is turning a blind eye. Remember for what Kholer Barnard was called a racist for? But when Tutu and the Zulu King publicly said that SA was better off during Apartheid than under Zuma and the ANC did Maimane jumped on his donkey to fight these “vicious racists”? NO!!

Maimane is full of confident that the DA will give the ANC a hiding in the Municipal elections of 2016 – yes with the white vote but the conservative whites will see through him.

And what Maimane does not realise is that the majority of black voters will only vote DA to get rid of Zuma. But once Zuma is gone, there will be an influx of black voters back to the ANC!

So DA, with alienating white voters and black voters to go back to the ANC once Zuma is gone, quo vadis? (Where to Then?)

Easy: Get rid  of Maimane and start fighting racism per se!

A White South African Shares His Story of Apartheid

Yesterday - 16 December - was Day of Reconciliation in South Africa – a public holiday.

As reconciliation is a pipe dream and a farce, people of all races, yes  whites included joined hands to march against the useless president Zuma – so at least for the momentous moments where all races thinking alike could reconcile to voice their concern and dismay over useless Zuma, and he used this day to lash out against whites once again – boring you would say because it happens regularly  just as his mentor Mugabe cannot stop talking about the whites and how they despise them.  But anyway, as long as Zuma and Mugabe talk about the whites, it means they still envy the whites for their superiority in everything – except dragging a country into the gutters and sewage – on this matter Zuma and Mugabe and their cronies are experts!

Back to my story – so, Zuma told a skeleton number of people (it were only those nobodies who usually vote for the ANC for the freebies who attended) at a Day of Reconciliation event in Port Elizabeth that there cannot be any reconciliation unless all races, including whites talk about Apartheid and share their stories of Apartheid. NOTE: I personally see this as a threat from Zuma that there must be a revolution before they (ANC) will reconcile with whites! (READ THE REPORT ABOUT THE EVENT HERE)

Here is my story of Apartheid:

As a white I am not ashamed of Apartheid and never will I say sorry for the system. Apartheid just meant separate development (Afsonderlike Ontwikkeling) – where every race could develop and manage themselves in designated areas. Even blacks accepted the system and its implementation with the establishment of inter alia Bophuthatswana, Transkei, Ciskei and other areas.

But, terrorists organisations like the ANC and PAC rather decided to reject it.Rather than to follow the avenue of consultation and diplomacy, they opted for the way of terrorism to fight this system. Read my article: Why the ANC is/has been doomedto fail as a Government.

The ANC brag that they established a democracy in South Africa? This is hogwash! You cannot establish a democracy by means of terrorism! That is why the ANC fails as a government.

Therefore, I will never reconcile unless the ANC accept responsibility for all their terrorism  attacks and acts of war crimes during their so-called struggle:

Bombings

In 1983, the Church Street bomb was detonated in Pretoria in front the South African Air Force Headquarters, resulting in 19 deaths and 217 injuries. I WAS THERE WHEN THE BOMB EXPLODED!!!

 During the next 10 years, a series of bombings occurred in South Africa, conducted mainly by MK:

In the 1985 Amanzimtoti bomb on the Natal South Coast, five civilians were killed and 40 were injured when Andrew Sibusiso Zondo detonated an explosive in a rubbish bin at a shopping centre shortly before Christmas. Fortunately this bastard was hanged!

In the 1986 Durban beach-front bombing, a bomb was detonated in a bar, killing three civilians and injuring 69. Robert McBride received the death penalty for this bombing which became known as the "Magoo's Bar bombing". McBride was supposed to hang too but he received clemency and what did the ANC do to spite the whites?? They appointed him as chief of MPD Ekurhuleni as reward for the bomb!

In 1987, an explosion outside a Johannesburg court killed three people and injured 10; a court in Newcastle had been attacked in a similar way the previous year, injuring 24. In 1987, a bomb exploded at a military command centre in Johannesburg, killing one person and injuring 68 personnel.

The terror campaign continued with attacks on a series of soft targets, including a bank in Roodepoort in 1988, in which four civilians were killed and 18 injured. Also in 1988, a bomb outside a magistrate's court killed three. At the Ellis Park rugby stadium in Johannesburg, a car bomb killed two and injured 37 civilians. A multitude of bombs in Wimpy Bar fast food outlets and supermarkets occurred during the late 1980s, killing and wounding many people. Wimpy were specifically targeted because of their perceived rigid enforcements of many apartheid laws, including excluding non-whites from their restaurants. Several other bombings occurred, with smaller numbers of casualties.

Landmine campaign

From 1985 to 1987, there also was a campaign to place anti-tank mines on rural roads in what was then the Northern Transvaal. This tactic was abandoned due to the high rate of civilian casualties—especially amongst black labourers. The ANC estimated 30 land-mine explosions resulting in 23 deaths, while the government submitted a figure of 57 explosions resulting in 25 deaths.

Zuma, there you have it – my apartheid story as asked by you and the reason why I despise the ANC just like they despise me.

If you want real reconciliation then you and all the main peanuts of the ANC who were responsible and gave orders for all the terrorist attacks must first apologize and then we will take it from there.

Why the ANC is/has been doomed to fail as a Government

The Media and the Social Media is rife with concerns over the way Zuma and his ANC are governing this once beautiful country.

There are many examples of Zuma’s foot in the mouth utterances but the most recent one that still has the country up in arms is that the ANC comes first and then the country.

And that remark is exactly what this article is all about – that is the typical rhetoric of a terrorist organisation and that is why South Africa is down the drain, because the ANC was and still is just a terrorist organisation and not a political party, only concerned with their own selfish agendas!!!!

I don’t have the faintest respect for Mandela because he lived a life of terrorism and died a terrorist, not an icon. I know people want to crucify me, they can, and I do not give a damn. Like a Luther of many centuries ago I can only say “Here I stand, I cannot deviate from my beliefs.” I even wrote an article about the Mandela as terrorist and you can read that article HERE!

But let us get back to the current situation of good governance (or lack of it!) in South Africa which is a farce. The ANC came to power as a terrorist organisation and never made the transition to a political party and equipped themselves as a political party to govern this country as it should be. (Mandela and his cronies were rather prepared to spend their lives in prison rotting than empower and equip them and their followers for this humongous task of governing a country!)

The difference between the ANC as terrorist organisation and the ANC as political party which they could have become is that terrorism is a means, not a cause. First mistake of the ANC, they thought they were fighting for a cause. Wrong! You can love the sinner, but you must hate the sin. Terrorism, by its very nature, is random. It must strike the innocent. Terrorism must kill the child if it is to shock the adult – and thus it only becomes a horrendous criminal act! Terrorism must hurt the helpless if it is to gain the world’s attention – making Mandela and his cronies nothing more than war criminals!

Terrorism is evil! It did not matter how noble was the cause that the ANC terrorists served, the methods were evil. Making them evil men and women. You could wrap terrorism in a flag of the most delicate black, green and gold, but that did not make it right!

The idiot liberals would say the ANC had no choice! WRONG!! A terrorist always chooses to use the bullet and the bomb because he knows that if he relinquishes those weapons then he is reduced to the level of the ordinary politicians who had to struggle with the mundane problems of EDUCATION, HEALTH, UNEMPLOYMENT, and all other pillars of government!! Terrorists (ANC) having no answer to those matters, talked in transcendent terms. They claimed their bullets would bring in the millennium and their bullets would make a perfect South Africa – 21 years after 1994, where are South Africa????  And the country is still gripped by terror, this time in another format!!

21 years into the so-called democracy, the ANC still have no answers to the mundane problems of EDUCATION, HEALTH, UNEMPLOYMENT, and all other pillars of government!!

Therefore, I rest my case; the ANC could never bridge the gap from terrorist organisation to political organisation! We are doomed!

Daniel H

Zuma: A President to be Respected and Trusted?

Zuma: A President to be Respected and Trusted or A President to be Booted Out?

Can You Trust and Respect This Man?

In a democracy where the people has spoken and decided by means of a fair election who must lead and govern the country, those who did not vote for the winning party or are not supporters of that party must accept this principle and actually support the elected government, to put the country first! That is where the expectation also comes from that the elected president and government must be trusted and respected.

But, a coin always has two sides and equally true and applicable is the principle that the president and his government are there to serve all citizens of that country and all citizens must also be equally respected, everyone is equal and the country comes first.

Unfortunately these noble principles of a democracy are not applicable to Zuma anymore. My opinion is that it was never applicable to him. Remember, whoever you are, you do not deserve respect and trust, you must earn it, and once you have earned it, you will deserve it.

From day one when he was elected for his first term, he did nothing to earn the trust and respect from all citizens. Think for yourself, could/can he be trusted when during the election campaign he sang with his rowdy supporters “Kill the Boer?” Certainly not, I for one do not and cannot trust him, will never!

And as his term continued and he even went into the second term he became more and more untrustworthy and since his first election up to today, he did not move a finger to earn respect. How can I respect him if he does not respect me, does not respect my language, does not respect my heritage, using every opportunity to blame the White people for everything that went wrong at the hands of the ANC during the past 21 years? And how can I respect and trust if he does not move a finger to safeguard my language and heritage, or my rights?

And the cherry on top was when he publically announced that the ANC comes first, only after that South Africa.

Can you trust and respect such a president. I cannot, I despise him!

Racism In South Africa: A White Perspective

A week does not go by in South Africa without at least one article in the Media or social platforms about racism in South Africa. Which may be good, but the manner in which it is done, gives me the creeps – it is usually a mumble-jumble of how this phenomenon is eating away the South African society like cancer but no facts are provided no solutions, and it is subtly suggested that it is Whites only who are the racists and it just stay there with the usual rhetoric week after week.

I am White and I will be the first one to admit that there are Whites who are racists and I despise it. But just to suggest that all Whites are racists is ludicrous. And to deny the fact or to keep quiet that Blacks, Coloreds and Asians are racists is also just as ludicrous and before I shoot myself in the foot, not all Blacks, Coloreds and Asians are racists. Just like with the Whites, they are in the minority.

It is also my opinion that Whites are the victims of racism in South Africa and before I am accused of generalization, here are my facts:

-       Street names and names of cities and towns were/are changed for the sake of hurting and spiting the Whites –what does names like Nylstroom, Pietersburg, Beit Bridge, Church Street, Vermeulen Street, etc. have to do with Apartheid? Nothing!  Even now, in 2015, the EFF declared war on ‘white town names’ in the Western Cape! Racism at its best, EFF!

-         The Kholer Barnard issue: by the mere fact that the ANC explicitly branded it a racial issue and even branded her as a racist because she is White and also branded the DA as racist because of the many Whites supporting the DA, the ANC was racist!

-          Zuma used/uses any opportunity to gun the Whites – example, his remarks on Jan van Riebeeck were according to me racist. And what about him singing “Kill the Boer?”

-          Vandalizing monuments and statues relating to the cultural heritage of the Whites because ‘it reminds Blacks of Apartheid’ is nothing less than racism against whites.

-          It is racism to have exclusive White institutions and bodies like schools and universities but it is not racism to have exclusive Black institutions and bodies like the Black Lawyers Association or the Black primary school in Devon where the language is Zulu and requests to introduce English also to allow Whites were rejected “in order to keep it Black’.

-       ANC politicians branding Whites as disloyal to South Africa because they do not attend cultural and public holiday events (because it is high jacked for political gain) is also racism.

-   The so-called campaigns against Afrikaans in the National Anthem, in schools and now also universities are also racism because it ‘is the Mother tongue of Whites’.

-   My perception is that the Black rhetoric that “this or that reminds us (21 years into the democracy?) of Apartheid” is nothing more than a reflection on Whites that “there is indeed no place for you in South Africa” which is racism.

There you are; my perceptions that that racism against Whites are alive and well in South Africa. Remember, it is a White person’s perceptions!

So, the Blacks, Coloureds, Indians and Whites all have their perceptions that they are the victims of racism.

What are the solutions? Easy, let us set perceptions aside and focus on individual cases and facts and address and solve those and those alone. And let us refrain from generalization. Only then we could move forward and avoid creating unnecessary racial tension and subsequent division of races into camps, because then the EFF’s wish will come true for a South African revolution where nobody will be winners!    

Jacob Zuma and his Paranoia regarding Whites

The more you get to know Jacob Zuma (something you don’t want to do but have to) the more you realize this man has paranoia regarding whites. Why? No even Zuma himself knows!

My opinion is that maybe he suffers from an inferior complex when he compares himself with whites. Or maybe he has a bad conscious as a result of all the atrocities of the ANC against whites during their so-called struggle for which nobody, not even arch-terrorist Mandela had the decency or guts to apologise  when they took over in 1994 – but the whites had to apologise over and over, even today.

Instead of apologising Zuma use every opportunity to gun the whites, even more than 21 years into the “new democracy” for things they, the ANC have buggered up – electricity crisis, water crisis, crime, you name something that they have buggered up and it is the whites. And don’t forget, the race card that is been played time after time. Recently he even blamed Jan Van Riebeeck for everything that went wrong!! And whenever he has the opportunity he blames white Europe – they are colonists, imperialists, racists, creators of the African migration problem, etc. But when it comes to the need for hand-outs he is there with his big fake smile like his visit to Germany!

Like I said unfortunately we have to take note of Zuma and live with it but at the end of the day it seems to be nothing more than a case of verbal diarrhea! 

Danie de Villiers

The Real Reason for the Students’ Fees Must Fall Revolt of 2015

To start with, I do not call them students because they do not deserve it. They are not students, they are hooligans and thugs. Because they did not act like students!

The entire 2015 these hooligans and thugs fabricated excuses not to study but rather to show that they are indeed hooligans and thugs.

There were the various incidents of marches and toi-toi’s against so-called racism on campuses, against Afrikaans, against monuments and statutes of the so-called white imperialists. You name it and they found a reason to break, destroy, burn and just to show us that they are indeed hooligans and thugs.

Then as the end of the academic year was upon the thugs and hooligans some of them realised they spent more time outside the classrooms that they got too far behind to salvage lost time – they would never pass the year-end exams.

So, what happened? Yes, they went to the streets again, this time to burn, destroy, break and just to be hooligans and thugs in the name of ‘no fee increases for 2016’ and ‘free tuition’. So, they knew that they would not pass 2015 but now they had the excuses they were revolting against fee increases and for free education.

And, now they would demand that all of them must be credited for the subjects of 2015.

And we know what will happen if universities do not comply . . . . . they will start 2016 academic year with a revolt!!

And the joke of the revolts of 2015 is that the Media and the DA supported these hooligans in their ‘noble’ quest for justice whilst the EFF actually was fuelling the revolts!

Yes, this is the South Africa we can be proud of?????

Is this a Defence Force we as South Africans must Trust and Respect?

Read this news item first: Army of Sex Pests

Is this a defence Force we must trust and respect? I don’t think so.

But then, what can we trust and respect now-a-days in South Africa?

Certainly not the general public service – service delivery is down the drain. The only thing they can do good is toy-toy and strike for more money.

Certainly not the SAPS – not all the criminal elements within the Service and with a Commissioner who should long ago been fired for the Marikana fiasco and the Lamoer issue.

Certainly not the Post Office – we do not know whether they strike or not because whether they strike or not, their service is pathetic.

Certainly not Eskom – they are incompetent to management the electricity supply for South Africa and therefore Eskom can collapse any day.

Certainly not the various MPD’s – the less we say about them the better!

Certainly not the ANC – the less we say about them the better.

And what about Zuma??  He is the least anybody can trust!

But let us go back the news item under discussion. With a President who in court stated that he did not used condoms because he took showers after sex, what example is he setting for all males in South Africa, including all male soldiers?  No wonder the Defence Force is

In conclusion, I ask again, is this a Defence Force we must trust? NO!! Rather be afraid, very afraid!

I do not trust Zuma nor respect him!

Danie